(无异曲线等比例放大缩小).pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
(无异曲线等比例放大缩小)

Chapter 6 Demand The demand function gives the optimal amounts of each of the goods as a function of the prices and income faced by the consumer: x1 (p1, p2, m) We now change the arguments in the demand function one by one. ?x1/?m 0: good 1 is a normal good ?x1/?m 0: inferior (depends on the income level we are talking about: bus, MRT, taxi) Two ways to look at the same thing (1) At x1 – x2 space, connect the demanded bundles as the budget line gets shifted outward. This curve is called the income offer curve (IOC) or income expansion path. (2) At x1 – m space, connect the optimal x1 bundles as the income increases while holding all prices fixed. This curve is called the Engel curve. Draw a general preference to illustrate the income offer curve and the Engel curve. Perfect substitutes: p1 p2, IOC (x axis), Engel (sloped p1) think about p1 p2 and p1 = p2. Perfect complements: IOC (at the corner), Engel (sloped p1+ p2) Cobb-Douglas: x1 = am/ p1 and x2 = (1-a)m/ p2 so x1/x2 is constant, thus IOC (line), Engel (sloped p1/a)) In the above three cases, (?x1/ x1)/(?m/m) = 1. They all belong to homothetic preferences. If (x1, x2) w (y1, y2), then for all t 0, (tx1, tx2) w (ty1, ty2). (無異曲線等比例放大縮小) If (x1, x2) is optimal at m, then (tx1, tx2) is optimal at tm. Suppose not, then (y1, y2) is feasible at tm and (y1, y2) s (tx1, tx2). Then (y1, y2) w (tx1, tx2) and it is not the case that (tx1, tx2) w (y1, y2). However, (y1/t, y2/t) is feasible at m, so (x1, x2) w (y1/t, y2/t). By homothetic preferences, (tx1, tx2) w (y1, y2), a contradiction. Reasonable? (toothpaste) Quasilinear preferences: p1 = p2 =1, u(x1, x2) = √x1 + x2 MU1 = 1/(2 √x1), MU2 = 1, MU1/p1 = MU2/p2 implies x1 = ? IOC: on the x-axis up to (1/4,0), then becomes vertical Engel: sloped 1 up to (1/4, 1/4), then becomes vertical “zero income effect” only after some point ?x1/?p1 0: good 1 is a Giffen good ?x1/?p1 0: good 1 is an ordinary good Two ways to look at the same thing (1) At x1 – x2 space,

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档