中国亚热带侵蚀红壤地造林后土壤有机碳和易变有机碳.doc

不同人为干预强度下红壤侵蚀退化荒地生态系统碳库恢复的差异 黄荣珍,朱丽琴,樊后保,李凤,胡良,易志强,黄诗华,贾龙 (南昌工程学院／江西省重点实验室, 江西 南昌 330099) 化成的荒地(HD)，以及在此基础上形成的木荷马尾松混交林（MM）、阔叶林(KY)、柑桔林(GJ)、封育林(FY)，调查了其地上、地下碳库和年均细根生物量。木荷马尾松混交林（267.22 thm2)、阔叶林(233.48 thm2)、封育林(112.01 thm2)生态系统碳储量显著大于荒地(27.04 thm2)，柑桔林(84.16 thm2)与荒地之间无显著差异（P＜0.05）。部分碳储量木荷马尾松混交林（187.88 thm2) 、阔叶林(164.17 thm2)、柑桔林(15.24 thm2) 、封育林(61.75 thm2)分别为(4.31 t/hm2)的43.56、38.06、3.53、14.32倍。地下部分（0-80cm）碳储量木荷马尾松混交林（79.34 thm2) 、阔叶林(69.31 thm2) 、柑桔林(68.93 thm2)、封育林(50.26 thm2)均显著高于对照(22.73 thm2) （P＜0.05）。混交林（112.15 gm2）、阔叶林(88.71 gm2）、柑桔林(257.70 gm2）、封育林(211.21 gm2）细根生物量分别为荒地(92.33 gm2）1.21、0.96、2.79、2.29倍，细根生物量与显著相关（（P0.05）。不同林生态系统、地上和地下碳积累的速率分别变化在2.04-8.58、0.39-6.56、0.98-2.02 t C/(hm2?a)范围。表明红壤侵蚀退化地快速S15712; S153. 61 Difference in ecosystem carbon pools after artificial intervention on red eroded wasteland HUANG Rongzhen , ZHU Liqin, FANG Houbao, Li Feng, HU Liang, YI Zhiqiang, HUANG Shihua, JIA Long (Research Institute of Ecology Environment Sciences,Nanchang Institute of Technology , Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Degraded Ecosystem Restoration and Watershed Eco-Hydrology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330099, China) Abstract： We investigated above- and below-ground carbon pools in wasteland on a slightly eroded red soil (HD), four artificial plantations, Schima superba and Pinus massoniana mixed forest (MM) , Broad-leaved forest (CK), Citrus reticulata forest (GJ) and closed forest(FY) that had been established on HD in 1984 in the subtropical China. The ecosystem carbon pool in MM（267.22 t/hm2)、KY (233.48 thm2)、FY (112.01 thm2) was significantly higher than in HD (27.04 t/hm2)，but there was no significantly difference between GJ(84.16 thm2) and HD（P＜0.05）. The plant carbon pool in MM（187.88 thm2)、KY (164.17 thm2)、GJ(15.24 thm2)FY (61.75 t/hm2) was 43.56、38.06、3.53、14.32 times as that in HD(4.31 thm2) respectively. The soil carbon pool in MM(79.34 t/hm2) 、KY(69.31 thm2) 、GJ(68.93 thm2)、FY(50.26 thm2) was significantly higher than in HD(22.73 t/hm2) （P＜0.05）. The annua