Profiles of For-Profit Education Management:公司的利润的教育管理.doc

Profiles of For-Profit Education Management:公司的利润的教育管理.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Profiles of For-Profit Education Management:公司的利润的教育管理

Profiles of For-Profit Education Management Companies 2001-2002 by Alex Molnar, Glen Wilson, Melissa Restori, and John Hutchison Introduction Publicly funded schools run by education management companies on a for-profit basis are a controversial innovation intended to improve schools through the profit-seeking motive of the marketplace. Supporters of this innovation argue that education management companies, in their pursuit of profits, will reduce administrative inefficiency, hire and retain effective administrators and teachers, introduce and refine new educational innovations, and produce gains in student achievement superior to those of regular public schools. While private sector companies have always transacted business with, and profited from selling supplies and equipment to schools, the idea of managing and administering K-12 publicly funded schools with the intent of making profits is relatively new. Seeing the similarities with health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that manage the health care process, Wall Street has used the term “EMO” or “education management organization,” to describe for-profit companies involved in the management and administration of public schools. The Structure of the Industry For-profit management of public schools generally takes two forms: local school districts contract with EMOs for the management of existing traditional K-12 public schools (termed “contract schools”) or the EMOs manage public charter schools either as the charter holder or under the terms of a contract with the charter holder. In the early 90’s, EMOs tended to pursue the contract school approach. In recent years, many EMOs have taken the opportunity afforded by permissive charter school legislation and focused on the management of charter schools. It now appears that the increase in the number of charter schools is the main source of EMO growth. Not surprisingly, states such as Michigan and Arizona with permissive charter school laws also have th

文档评论(0)

qiwqpu54 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档