国外精美设计模板3.pptVIP

Developments in the Netherlands The Dutch Whispering Train programme   Workshop on noise differentiated track access charges and other rail noise developments at the EU level Brussels - 27 April 2010 Jasper Peen [03-398516] Content The Whispering Train Program Goal and approach Results until now – equivalent conicity Outlook The Whispering Train Program The Whispering Train Program Program Goal LL-blocks Determine Noise effect Determine LCC Optimise Maintainability Contribute to homologation Approach In service tests started in 2006 200 wagons with LL blocks 4 different types of LL blocks 6 different types of wagons Several fleetowners and operators, including transalpine Extensive monitoring The Whispering Train Program Results Noise effect: LL-blocks reduce noise satisfactorily Wagons comply to TSI Noise levels (though testing not needed) Durable noise reduction LCC: many insights in wear and degradation patterns, no final conclusions Influence composite blocks on EC Conclusions from analysis of more than 10.000 wheel profiles of 130 wagons With composite-blocks increase of EC, with GG more/less stable Huge differences Type LL-block Type of wagon/application Especially the organic IB116* block has less influence on the EC, behaves comparable to other homologated organic brake blocks Currently wagons with LL-blocks need to be inspected after 50.000 km Results from in-service test throughout Europe will be collected and analyzed to extend current short inspection intervals of IB116* Influence EC on running stability Measurements:Find relation equivalent conicity ? running stability Are the wagons within the pilots behaving within the applicable limit values? Influence EC on running stability Current UIC statement Based on limited insights, max EC of 0.23 (unknown track quality) or 0.4 (known track quality) allowed Influence Equivalent Conicity on LCC Mileage before reprofiling is needed: Cast iron: 300.000 – 350.000 km LL-blocks in these applic