库存与配送联合优化若干问题分析-analysis of several problems in joint optimization of inventory and distribution.docxVIP

under an elastic demand and sensitive price environment. Suppose the supplier is dominant in the supply chain, it considers pricing, inventory and transportation cost simultaneously under the price sensitive environment. It analyses non-cooperation decision and centralized decision models respectively. It designs two coordination strategies, revenue sharing and price discount, to appropriately divide the system profit to both parties to make sure of their cooperation. The experimental results show: comparing with the supplier-Stackelberg game structure, centralized cooperation decision can greatly increase the system profit. Through revenue sharing and price discount strategy, the system coordination can be implemented efficiently and the increased system profit can be appropriately divided to the retailer and the supplier.It considers the inventory routing problem without considering the supplier’s inventory. In a two-echelon decentralized supply chain with one supplier and multi-retailers, it models the inventory and transportation integrated optimization problem, and proposes a modified nearest neighbor algorithm in order to increase the whole profit of supply chain by decreasing the transportation cost and inventory cost. It designs a proper pricing strategy, proposes the upper and lower bounds of the prices, reallocates the profit of the supply chain to the supplier and the retailers, thus realizes “multi-win” and improves supply chain coordination.It considers the inventory routing problem considering the supplier’s inventory cost. In a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and multi-retailers, the retailers and the supplier have inventory costs. It discusses how to implement the integrated optimization of inventory and transportation, analyses the decentralized and centralized decision scenarios respectively, builds the mathematical models and designs heuristic algorithms. The research results show that centralized decision is superior to decentralize