论我国示范诉讼之建构——以群体诉讼制度的多元化为视角-on the construction of chinas model litigation —— from the perspective of diversity of group litigation system.docxVIP

论我国示范诉讼之建构——以群体诉讼制度的多元化为视角中文摘要论我国示范诉讼之建构——以群体诉讼制度的多元化为视角中文摘要我国目前处于社会转型期，群体性的纠纷不断发生，内部矛盾相对突出，已成为 世界上发生群体性纠纷较多的国家之一。对此现状，中共十六大报告第一次将“社会 更加和谐”作为重要目标提出，中共十六届四中全会进一步提出构建社会主义和谐社 会的任务。和谐社会理念的提出，进一步推动了我国对解决群体性纠纷相关制度的反 思和重构。在民事诉讼领域，各地人民法院受理的群体性案件呈逐年上升趋势，而我 国现有的代表人诉讼，作为单一的群体诉讼制度，在解决群体性纠纷中发挥的作用却 极其有限，远远不能适应司法实践的需要。本文以群体诉讼制度的多元化为价值目标， 从示范诉讼的概念出发，介绍其类型、特征与价值，然后考察、比较他国示范诉讼制 度的立法与实践，并对示范诉讼的主要法律关系、裁判效力的扩张依据进行分析，最 后围绕我国的司法实践，指出目前代表人诉讼制度在解决群体性纠纷中存在的局限， 并在此基础上提出我国建构示范诉讼的基本框架。关键词：群体诉讼；代表人诉讼；示范诉讼；作者：倪志钧 指导老师：张永泉AbstractThe construction of test case in China——From the perspective of diverse group case procedureThe construction of test case in China——From the perspective of diverse group case procedureAbstractChina now is in a period of transition, and group cases continue to occur. Internal inconsistency is highlighted relatively. China has become one of countries in the world that have occurred much group cases. For this current situation, the 16th Party Congress report clearly ambitious goal of the construction of a harmonious society for the first time. The Fourth Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee further present the task for building a harmonious society. The concept of social harmony further impelled introspection and reconstruction to solve the relevant system for group cases. In civil procedure, group cases are increasing year by year on courts all over the country. But our actions to solve theexisting representative groups of the role of the case are extremely limited，and are notadapt to civil dispute resolution practice group needs. The value goal of this paper is group lawsuit varied system, and it talks about the concept of test case，and introduces its types， features and value. Then the legislation and practice of test case in other countriesare studied and compared. Main legal relationship and the referee expansion of judgment are analyzed. At last this paper proposed the problem of delegate action， the legislation of delegate action are not suitable for op