公司司法解散制度分析——以有限责任公司股东请求司法解散公司为视角-analysis of the judicial dissolution system of the company - from the perspective of shareholders request for judicial dissolution of the company.docx

下载文档 降价啦

15
0
约2.89万字
约 35页
2018-06-04 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

公司司法解散制度分析——以有限责任公司股东请求司法解散公司为视角-analysis of the judicial dissolution system of the company - from the perspective of shareholders request for judicial dissolution of the company.docx

1、本文档共35页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

公司司法解散制度分析——以有限责任公司股东请求司法解散公司为视角-analysis of the judicial dissolution system of the company - from the perspective of shareholders request for judicial dissolution of the company

AbstractTheCorporationLawpassedin1994wasapremature”whichadoptedinthe commercialsense ofbeingindifferenttothecommunityasawhole.Whilebusinessorganizationshadthebasicframework,thecontentwastoorigidandoutdated.BecausethelegislationexcessiveconsideredChinesecharacteristicsandlackofbusinessrules,thecompanybecameaclosedgroupofbigshareholder’swillwhichdeniedtheconflictofinterestsbetweenshareholders.Becauseoftheprincipleof“majoritydecision”whichresultedinnorestraintofthebigshareholder’sconduct,itwasreasonablethatthecompanystemmingfromthejudicialsystemhaddissolved.Andthereforethecourtsuniversallyshowedapassiveattitudetowardthelawsuitofjudicialdissolutionbyshareholders,whichresultedingreatdamageoftheshareholders’interests,especiallythoseoftheminorityshareholders.ThenewChineseCompanylaw,which came into effect on 1st,Jan 2006,imports the system of judicialdissolutionforthefirsttime.Art183ofthelawdefinitelyprescribesthatshareholderscanbringasuitofjudicialdissolutionofacompanyonstatutorysituations.However,itistoosimpletobeappliedinthejudicialpracticebecauseofthedeficiencyofthedefendantinalawsuit,legalproceeding,supplementarymeasuresandaftermath.Asaresult,theauthortriestoexplorethetheoreticalfoundationofthejudicialdissolutionsystem，andmakessomecommentonthesystemofChinasnewCompanyLawonthebasisofthetheoryandthepracticeofothercountries.Theauthorhopesthatthispreliminarystudywillmakesomecontributionstoabetterapplicationtotheacademicandthelegalpractice.Thearticlemainlyconsistsofthepreface，themainbodyandtheconclusion.Onthebasisofthedefinitionofthecompany’sjudiciarydissolutionandthelegislationofothercountries,theprefacecomplieswiththecauseandmainpurposeofthisarticle.Themainpartyincludesthreeparts.Thefirstpartistheintroductionofthereasonandtheconditionsofthecase.Afterabriefdescriptionofthat,theauthorpointedoutthefocusesofthecasewhicharewhetherthecompanywasdeadlockedanditsmanagementwasinseriousdifficultiesthatcannotsolvedthroughotherchannels.Thesecondpartisthetheoreticalandnormativeanalysiso