子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后探讨-妇产医学论文.docVIP

子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后探讨-妇产医学论文.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后探讨-妇产医学论文.doc

子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后探讨-妇产医学论文 子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后探讨 陈冰亚 浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院,浙江杭州310006 [摘要] 目的 探讨子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变锥切术后切缘阳性的处理及预后,总结治疗经验。方法 以子宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变患者锥切术后切缘阳性再行手术治疗的228例作为研究对象,根据第2次术后病理结果将研究对象分为病变残留和无残留两组,对两组患者相关因素进行比较分析。结果 病变无残留者133例,占58.33%,残留者95例,占41.67%,两组患者年龄差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),首次手术方式、病变级别、阳性切缘病变级别、阳性切缘部位、HPV差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 术前HPV高拷贝、病变级别高、特别是原位癌、阳性切缘位于颈管端的患者病变残留高风险,需行再次锥切或严密随访。切缘部位为原位癌者建议扩大子宫切除。具体治疗方案需结合患者意愿、生育要求、随访条件而定。 关键词 子宫颈上皮内瘤变;锥切术;切缘阳性 [中图分类号] R725[文献标识码] A[文章编号] 1674-0742(2014)04(c)-0021-03 Discussion on the Treatment of Positive Margin for Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia after Conization and the Prognosis CHEN Bingya Womens Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310006, China [Abstract] Objective To investigate the treatment of positive margin for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization and the prognosis, and summarize the experience of treatment. Methods 228 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients with positive margin after conization underwent surgical treatment for the second time were selected as the subjects. Based on the second postoperative pathology results, the subjects were divided into two groups of residual lesions and no residue, and the related factors of two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results The lesions without residual in 133 cases, accounting for 58.33%, residual in 95 cases, accounting for 41.67%; the difference between two groups in age was not statistically significant (P0.05), but the differences between the groups in the first mode of operation, pathological grade, positive margin lesion grade, positive margin part, and HPV were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion Preoperative HPV high copy, high grade lesions, especially carcinoma in situ, positive margins in the neck tube end of the lesions in patients with residual high risk, need the second conization or close follow-up.

文档评论(0)

zhangningclb + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档