正当防卫与聚众斗殴的界限——以何某等人聚众斗殴案为例-the boundary between justifiable defense and affray - taking he mou and others affray case as an example.docx

下载文档 降价啦

11
0
约3.22万字
约 36页
2018-06-09 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

正当防卫与聚众斗殴的界限——以何某等人聚众斗殴案为例-the boundary between justifiable defense and affray - taking he mou and others affray case as an example.docx

1、本文档共36页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

正当防卫与聚众斗殴的界限——以何某等人聚众斗殴案为例-the boundary between justifiable defense and affray - taking he mou and others affray case as an example

人自身条件、行为人的文化水平和法律知识水平、行为人的主观心态、以及行为所造成的后果等方面综合认定是否是正当防卫。关键词：正当防卫；聚众斗殴；寻衅滋事ThispaperchoosethecrimeofaffraybyHeetalasacasestudy.Thecaseonestonearouses1000billow,whichcausedjurisprudentialcircle,judicialpracticeandthegeneralpublic’sattention.Themainlydisputeiswhetherit’stheself-defenseortheaffray,thatis,thedifferencebetweencrimeandnoncrime.Bylegalanalysisonrelevantissues,analyzeandinterpretthecase,itcanprovidesomeguidanceforjudicialofficewhoworkforcitizensandonbehalfofthestatepowerwhenencountersuchissues.Theguidingsignificanceofthecaseanalysisondealingwithsimilarcasesis:First，therearemanypeopleinvolvedinfightingbehaviorisnotnecessarilytheaffray;Second,isbehaviorpreparednotnecessarilyresistanceisthefoundationofjustifiabledefense.Thearticleisdividedintofourparts.Thefirstpartisthebasicsituationofthecase,First,thecauseofaction;second,istheintroductionofthecase,whichgivesabriefdescriptionofdisputecase;Third,isthedifferentopinionsofjudiciaryandlawyersonthecaseofqualitativedifferencesinthetrialprocessanddifferentreactionsofacademiaandthepubliconthehandlingofcases;fourth,thefocusofdebate.Thesecondpartisthelegalanalysisonrelatedissuesofthecase,thisisthemaincontentofthepaper.Itisdividedintothreeaspects.Thefirstaspectistodefinethejustifiabledefensefromthecause,intention,timeofthedefense.Thenexpoundsthecause,theintentionofdefenseanddefensedisputearises,justifiabledefenseanddefense,justifiabledefenseandpersuadedthemelee,preparationbehaviorandjustifiabledefense.Thesecondaspectistodefinetheelementsofaffraycrimethroughthetwopointofviewobject,fromthiscaserelatedtothecrimeofaffrayofaffraycrimesubjectiveaspectandthenexpoundsthedifferencebetweenaffraycrimeandthecrimeofintentionalinjury,crimeofaffrayandstiruptroublecrime.Thethirdaspectsstatethepossibilitythejustifiabledefencecanhappeninaffray.Thethirdpartcombinewiththesecondpart’sanalysisonjustifiabledefenceself-defenseandaffray,giveathoroughanalysisofthecase,illustratewhatHeetalisself-defenseanddoesnotconstitutethecrimeofaffray,thecrimeof