职务犯罪案件自首认定条件探究.docVIP

职务犯罪案件自首认定条件探究 　　自首情节认定一直是办理职务犯罪案件的重点，也是难点。法律和司法解释对如何认定自首有较为详细的规定，而由于执法者对法律法和司法解释的不同解读，在自首的认定方面存在较多的分歧及争议，再加上司法实践本身的多样性、复杂性，在自首情节认定上存在诸多“说不清，道不明”,难以准确理解和把握的问题。例如自动投案中投案的“自动性”如何认定；投案后未及时如实供述犯罪事实能否认定为自首，司法解释规定的“办案机关已经掌握的犯罪事实”、“办案机关已掌握线索针对犯罪事实”以及“在办案机关调查谈话、讯问、采取调查措施或者强制措施期间，交代犯罪事实”应作何理解，以及由纪委监察机关在查办党员干部违纪违法案件时发现并移交给司法机关的职务犯罪案件，自首认定条件与司法机关侦查发现的职务犯罪案件有何不同。针对上述问题，笔者通过对现实案例的剖析，试图对职务犯罪案件自首认定中存在的疑难问题进行分析探索，在此基础上，结合相关刑法理论，提出可资借鉴的观点，以期对司法实践有一定的参考价值和指导意义。 　　关键词：职务犯罪；自首；自动投案；如实供述 　　ABSTRACT 　　The surrender in the criminal facts is always the key point of the handleposition , is also the difficulty.laws and judicial interpretations have detailed rules todecide how to surrender, and by the law enforcement and judicial interpretation ofthe law on legal interpretation is different, in terms of surrender that there existdifferences and disputes, plus the diversity and complexity during the judicialpractice itself, on in that there are many difficult to accurately grasp the problem. 　　Such as automatic surrendered to surrender in what is considered “automaticity”;Surrendered after the failed to timely truthfully confesses criminal facts can beidentified as surrendered, and the judicial interpretation provisions “case-handlingorgan have criminal facts”and “case-handling organ have clues to criminalfacts”and “survey conversation, in the case authority during interrogation andinvestigation measures or mandatory measures, confessed the crime” what itshould be understood, as well as by the procuratorial organs in the investigation fordisciplinary violations of cadres cases found and handed over to the judicial organsof post crimes, in that condition and judicial organs investigation found that thedifference of post crimes. Aiming at these problems, the author through to the realcase analysis, trying to surrender in post crime that the analysis of existing problemsin the exploration, on this basis, combining with the related criminal law theory, putforward views for reference, in order to t