GRE写作逻辑题习作点评上智课教育旗下智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 GRE写作逻辑题习作点评上-智课教育旗下智课教育 对于GRE作文考试，有的同学可能并不清楚，通过本文小编就为各 位同学介绍一下GRE写作逻辑题习作点评的相关资料，供同学们参考学 习，希望能够为大家提供实质性的帮助。 下文就是的相关内容，同学们如果觉得有用可以积累下来好好研究 ，一定能写出符合要求的好文章，祝大家都能拿到 GRE写作 高分成绩。 二. 逻辑问题例文分析 Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Sample One Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after rollerskating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within this group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing any protective clothing (helmets, knee pads, etc.) or any light-reflecting material (clip-on lights, glow-in-the-dark wrist pads, etc.). Clearly, these statistics indicate that by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, rollerskaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident. Benchmark 6—Outstanding The notion that protective gear reduces the injuries suffered in accidents seems at first glance to be an obvious conclusion. After all, it is the intent of these products to either prevent accidents from occuring in the first place or to reduce the injuries suffered by the wearer should an accident occur. However, the conclusion that investing in high quality protective gear greatly reduces the risk of being severely injured in an accident may mask other (and potentially more significant) causes of injuries and may inspire people to over invest financially and psychologically in protective gear. First of all, as mentioned in the argument, there are two distinct kinds of gear—preventative gear (such as light reflecting material) and protective gear (such as helmets). Preventative gear is intended to warn others, presumably for the most part motorists, of the presence of the roller skater. It works only if the other is a responsible and caring individual who will afford the skater the necessary space and attent