文档资料精品课件_女性主义翻译理论.pptVIP

Theorizing Feminist Discourse/Translation女性主义话语/翻译的理论阐释 Outline Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Criticism on Equivalence ⅰ. Poetics of Transparency ⅱ. Criticism ⅲ. Breakthrough Ⅲ. Feminist Translation ⅰ. The Role of the Translator ⅱ. The Nature of Translation ⅲ. Translation as Rewriting ⅳ. Summary Ⅳ. Perspective ⅰ. Several New Concepts ⅱ. Conclusion Ⅰ. Introduction In this, feminist discourse presents transformation as performance as a model for translation. Transformation of the text is conceived within the axioms of topology(拓扑学：是近代发展起来的一个研究连续性现象的数学分支). However, this is at odds with the long dominant theory of translation as equivalence grounded in a poetics of transparence(透明诗学). Ⅱ. Criticism on Equivalence ⅰ. Poetics of Transparency This is perceived to be no opposition between signifier and signified, but an isomorphism(同构), a complete parallelism of the content and expression, of meaning and sound. Such a translation is characterized by the way in which certain cultural traces and also certain self-reflexive elements are eliminated from the text so that the translated text is deprived of its foundation in events. In this way are effaced the translator’s dual activities of reading and (re)writing. ⅱ. Criticism What such a theory of translation based on equivalency ignores is the extreme difficulty in translating meaning because of the importance of co-textual (formal) and contextual(上下文) relationships. ⅲ. Breakthrough Equivalence is located between the coding-decoding operations of two text systems(文本系统) rather than between the contents or words of two messages. As Bassnett/McGuire frames this: Author-Text-Receiver=Translator-Text-Receiver 原文作者—原文—原文读者=译者—译文—译文读者. Ⅲ. Feminist Translation ⅰ. The Role of The Translator In translation theory, pragmatics understands the translator to be an active reader first before becoming a writer. ⅱ. The Nature of Transl