- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
公众参与使城市规划制定更加的民主文翻译
毕业论文外文翻译
题目:现代行政中心发展概述及其亲民性设计理念
外文翻译之一
Is Public Participation Making Urban Planning More Democratic? The Israeli Experience
Author:NURIT ALFASI
Nationality:Israeli
Reference:Planning Theory PracticeABSTRACT: The article examines the alleged connection between the goal of democratization of the Israeli planning system and ‘public participation in planning’. It begins by claiming that the planning system in Israel is a non-democratic environment within the democratic state. This situation has stimulated the enormous development of theoretical and practical work relating to ‘public participation’. Yet, statutory and voluntary participation mechanisms in Israel have not been able to in?uence the decision-making structure in planning. Moreover, most public organizations and NGOs that are supposed to represent the voice of the public are far from being genuine public delegates. The article also relates to the power/knowledge problem, stating that participation processes cannot escape it. The article highlights the widely experienced tensions between the democratization of planning through more consultative and participative processes, the role of elected representatives and of civil society movements which choose co-operative rather than oppositional strategies.
Introduction
Public participation is an idea that has been around for a long time, as long as modern
urban planning. Yet it refuses to exhaust itself or become jaded. On the contrary, a brief look at recent planning practice and academic studies will reveal that public participation is the subject of an ongoing, lively debate. It is in the forefront of the latest planning projects, opens leading international planning conferences and is the topic of some of the most fashionable books. Interest in the subject does not seem to fade, therefore it is safe to assume that the large body of academic and practical work dealing with public participation will continue to grow. This article focuses on the barriers to publ
文档评论(0)