Dandelions 2006 first results蒲公英2006第一的的结果.pptVIP

* Results Conclusions and Outlook MAX-DOAS NO2 profile and tropospheric column data for almost all golden days Tropospheric vertical column agrees well with pure geometric approach - in agreement with previous studies:VC is not very sensitive to retrieval parameters Comparison to in situ measurements contradictory: general variation captured well, in particular for polluted days in situ much higher - interference problem?? Comparison with NO2-LIDAR much better in terms of absolute values, but profile shape of the LIDAR is different All in all not very surprising: NO2 is very variable in time, in space (and in experiment) - in particular more profile measurements needed * Results * * * * * * * folkard@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de folkard@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de Ground-based measurements of tropospheric NO2 - Comparison of MAX-DOAS results to other instruments for DANDELIONS- Folkard Wittrock, Hilke Oetjen, Anja Sch?nhardt, Andreas Richter, John P. Burrows - IUP Bremen Hester Volten, Daan Swart - RIVM Ellen Brinksma - KNMI Outline DANDELIONS campaign MAX-DOAS Profile Retrieval Algorithm ?BREAM“ Results – focusing on 2nd campaign in 2006 BREAM / geometric approach BREAM / in situ BREAM / LIDAR BREAM / satellite Conclusions and Outlook * DANDELIONS CESAR site (Cabauw) located at 51.971°N, 4.927°E 0.70 m below ASL Dandelions Objectives: Validation of satellite measurements Intercomparison of instruments (NO2, O3, aerosols) NO2: ground in situ, lower tropospheric profile (lidar), total columns MAX-DOAS intercomparison - ideal for evaluation of MAX-DOAScapabilities for profile retrieval “Dutch Aerosol and Nitrogen Dioxide Experiments for vaLIdation of OMI and SCIAMACHY“ MAX-DOAS Detection: UV/vis measurement of scattered sunlight measured for different lines of sight Method: Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy - DOAS Result: averaged absorption along all contributing light paths - Slant Column Retrieval: Correction for vertical sensitivity (a