Polychronic Tendency Models A Gender Contrast Study多元趋势模型的性别对比的研究.pptVIP

下载本文档

7
0
约3.46千字
约 20页
2018-06-18 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Polychronic Tendency Models A Gender Contrast Study多元趋势模型的性别对比的研究.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Polychronic Tendency Models A Gender Contrast Study多元趋势模型的性别对比的研究

Polychronic Tendency Models: A Gender Contrast Study by Jay D. Lindquist Western Michigan University and Carol F. Kaufman-Scarborough Rutgers University Introduction Polychronic and monochronic behavior (time use) Studies from the 1950’s on Hall (1959) Economic resource (1970’s – early 1990’s) Working women juggling work, social, marketplace, and family demands (1980’s on) Polychronic scale development begins (late 1980’s) The Polychronic Attitude Index (PAI) (1991) Polychronic – MonochronicChronological Background Hall’s conceptualization Economic resource and fixed time budget approach Time pressure and convenience impact Polychronic – MonochronicChronological Background Direct and indirect measures F-A-S-T Scale Time Dimension Scales Time Structure Questionnaire Time Management Behavior Scale Polychronic Attitude Index Polychronic – MonochronicChronological Background Multidisciplinary Constructs Modified PAI (PAI3) Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV) Research Directions Simultaneous Multiple Activity Activity changing behavior What are “activities” Need for new models The Study Objectives – develop and compare gender-specific models of polychronic tendency Hypothesis 1 – models will consist of both SMA and AC items The Study Hypothesis 2 – the two gender-specific models will differ from one another Methodology Phase I N = 257 adults (f = 118, m = 139) Develop pool of potential SMA and AC items Assure respondents have same “activities” understanding (physically active, mentally active, monitoring, and eye/ear attention) Item Pool SMA items JUGLTWO, SHTRYTWO, COMFTWO, TRYTWO, DOTWO, ENJOYTWO, ENERGTWO, EFFICTWO, EFFECTWO, APROVTWO AC items CHGMORE, COMFCHG, ENJOYCHG, ENERGCHG, EFFICCHG, EFFECCHG, APROVCHG Methodology Phase II N = 386 adults (f = 219, m = 167) Develop best fit, parsimonious gender-specific models Compare models Items in “Best Fit” Models SMA – Women JUGLTWO, SHTRYTWO, COMFTWO, ENJOYTWO and EFFICTWO SMA – Men JUGLTWO, SHTRYTWO, COMFTWO, an