“Fair not F.ppt

Slide is suspect because of the coding problem with UM-Lessons. The “Masters College” option was automatically chosen when people began the survey, so all of those responses were pulled. Nonetheless we are reasonably confident that the majority of our respondents came from doctoral granting and public institutions. It would have been great to ask which if these institutions sought the Carnegie engaged classification in hindsight. Change culture Change policy Promote flexibility of new policies Value and reward service Aggressively advocate Discuss risks of interdisciplinary research In descending order, representing responses that were repeated at least four times (there were 22 total). More than one code may be assigned to each quotation. Example quotes are on the following slides. “I would like to better advise junior faculty and graduate students about careers in academia in which public scholarship is viable and part of the promotion process.” Promote personal support A major focus of the TTI interview was getting higher education leaders to talk about the possibilities of institutional change to better support public scholarship in its full definition. TTI members mentioned both human and financial resources as necessary supportive components for institutional change to bolster public scholarship. Importance of translational language TTI Survey: Change Policies “I am invested in the expansion and legitimization of public scholarship and creative work in general and am therefore committed to advancing changes in promotion and tenure policies at public and private universities in the U.S.” “Policies that recognize the multiple roles of faculty members in research, teaching, and public service, and that take into account that students, departments, and institutions are best served when faculty actively engage in public scholarship.” “I would like to help establish fair and equitable tenure guidelines for my department and the university. TTI Survey: Cha