交通肇事罪中“因逃逸致人死亡”问题探究(毕业论文)2.docVIP

交通肇事罪中“因逃逸致人死亡”问题探究 摘要 1997年新刑法对交通肇事罪进行了比较重大的修改,但对交通肇事罪“因逃逸致人死亡”这一加重情节的规定较为简单,而现实中逃逸致人死亡的行为非常复杂,从而导致了理论上和实践上的较大分歧。2000年11月15日,最高人民法院颁布的《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》对于“因逃逸致人死亡”的界定以及相关情节的认定问题作了解释,但是该解释仍然存在可商榷之处。文章以刑法理论为指导,通过对交通肇事罪“因逃逸致人死亡”的罪过形式、适用范围以及司法界定的分析探究,以加深对此问题的理解。对“因逃逸致人死亡”中人的理解宜作限制解释;行为人的罪过形式只能是过失而不能是故意;肇事者在逃逸时如果对被害人死亡的结果持放任态度就构成故意杀人罪。 关键词：交通肇事;因逃逸致人死亡;罪过形式; 过失 RESEARCH ON THE PROBLEM of“DEATH CAUSED BY ESCAPING”IN THE CRIME of TRAFFIC ACCIDENT Abstract 1997，The new criminal law makes an important modification on traffic accident crime, but it is comparatively simple for the regulations about the crime of hit and run leading to victim’s death. However, hit and run in traffic accidents are very complicated in our daily lives. Thus there are many differences between theory and practice. On November15, 2000, the Supreme People‘s Court promulgated a law in which the justice defined and the related circumstances of “death caused by hit and run” are clearly explained. However, this explanation remains open to question in several aspects. With the guide of criminal law, this theory is to enhance the understanding of this issue through the analysis and research of the target scope, the constituent elements as well as the justice defined of the traffic accident crimes “death caused by hit and run”. We should limitedly comprehend the person in causing death by escaping Hit-and-run case. The offence form of doer is lapse, but not intent. It will come into being the criminal of deliberately kills if the running away of peace breaker results. Key words: traffic accident; death caused by escaping; offence form; negligence 目 录 引言 3 一、交通肇事罪中“因逃逸致人死亡”的罪过形式 3 （一）对于罪过形式主要存在的三种观点 4 1、 4 2、第二种观点,“过失兼间接故意论” 4 3、第三种观点,“过失论” 4 （二） 4 1、从刑法分则条文体系的科学性可以得知 4 2、从罪责刑相适应的原则上可以得知 4 3、从立法的目的可以得知 5 4、从刑法分则条文的语义上可以得知 5 二、 5 （一） 5 1、“因逃逸致人死亡”是指发生交通肇事后,肇事者不及时抢救被害人而逃离现场,致使被害人因抢救不及时而死亡 5 2、行为人交通肇事后,在逃跑过程中又发生交通事故,致第二次交通事故中被害人死亡 5 3、交通肇事后行为人为毁灭罪证,将被害人移入一些不易察觉的地方后逃离现场,致使被害人失去抢救的机会而死亡 6 4、行为人交通肇事后