Broadening the bndwidth on ‘ethics’拓宽了带宽对“道德”.pptVIP

GIPA and CBR Broadening the bandwidth on ‘ethics’ Robb Travers, PhD Wilfrid Laurier University CBR and GIPA CBR: Meaningfully engaging community in action-oriented research partnerships… Ensuring community control in research ideas, processes, and outcomes… GIPA: GIPA increases the commitment to ensuring that PHAs are involved in, and have some control over, HIV/AIDS research, program development, and policymaking Research and GIPA Positive outcomes of GIPA: improves the quality of prevention and care programming reduces stigma and isolation for PHAs enhances policy development increases feelings of personal empowerment and self-worth enhances the credibility of AIDS service organizations as policy actors what’s the state of GIPA in relation to CBR in Ontario? Research and GIPA The Greater Involvement of People Living with AIDS Principle: Theory vs. Practice in Ontario’s HIV/AIDS Community-Based Research Sector Robb Travers, PhD Michael Wilson, PhD Sarah Flicker, PhD Adrian Guta, MSW Tarik Bereket, MA Colleen McKay, MA Anna van der Meulen, MA Shelley Cleverly, MSC Melisa Dickie, MHSc Jason Globerman, BSc Sean B. Rourke, PhD What did we do? Modified a survey tool used by Flicker and Savan (2005) in Barriers and Facilitators for CBR in Canada surveys administered on-line participants invited via email conducted telephone follow-up Who did we talk to? Executive Directors in community-based AIDS organizations selected from a list of organizations funded by MOHLTC AIDS Bureau sent to 51 organizations (primary HIV mandate, geographical/client diversity, size) 38 surveys completed (75% response rate) Phase II follow-up (25 interviews) What did we want to know? experiences and perceptions of CBR barriers and facilitating factors for CBR challenges to implementing HIV/AIDS CBR principles PHA involvement on CBR research teams Our framework ‘input’ (question identification and study design), ‘process’ (data collec