Long-range fractal dynamic in visual search amp; beyond长距离的视觉搜索和分形动力学；超越.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约1.62万字
约 147页
2018-06-23 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

Long-range fractal dynamic in visual search amp; beyond长距离的视觉搜索和分形动力学；超越.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Long-rangefractaldynamicinvisualsearch

Long-range fractal dynamic in visual search beyond Scale-free -- Find: What does visual search teach us? Perceptual processes! Efficiency Accuracy Mechanisms Automatic vs.Voluntary Distributed vs. Focused Attention Inattention, Pre- Post-attention Early vs. late vision Search strategy Parallel, Serial, random or…? Features... Find the odd item Discriminate by.. Color xxxxxxx Size xxxxxxx Orientation ------l- Movement xxxx-- Depth Conjunction Search Fbination of features 2 orientations (particular arrangement) Find: L among Ts The change in RT and/or accuracy with set size is a measure of the efficiency of search. In highly efficient searches, attention is deployed directly to the target location and, thus, the number of distractors does not influence RT. In inefficient search through items that can be identified without fixation, each additional distractor typically adds 20-40 ms to the time required to find a present target and 40-80 ms to the time required to determine that a target is not present (Wolfe, 1998). My contribution to our understanding of ‘early’ vision ARVO ‘95 What guides search? Horowitz, T.S. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual Search has no memory. Nature, 357, 575-577. Memory in visual search? Memory for locations in search (Kristjansso,2000) Identity of objects accumulates over time (Treisman Gelade, 1980) Implicit memory (lots of context effects)Olivia Wolfe, 2004) Random repositioning of stimuli does not affect search RTs (Horowitz Wolfe, 1998) Inattentional amnesia in search (Wolfe, 1999) (Wolfe, 2003; Wolfe et al. , 2000, 2002) described repeated search tasks in which familiarity with a search display produced little or no improvement in search efficiency Horowitz, T.S. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual Search has no memory. Nature, 357, 575-577. Overview QUESTIONS. What guides complicated eye movements? Random or non-random process? Is there memory across fixations? Might neural interactions drive