试辩柏拉图非诗.pdfVIP

华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 摘 要 本文由柏拉图关于名称问题的探讨入手，论证柏拉图对名称与事物间的一致性 持怀疑态度。基于这种怀疑，柏拉图对既定的名词与概念都忍不住加以重新探讨， “诗”之本质即在其列。于是本文首先梳理了古希腊时期“诗”之不同名称及其含 义，与柏拉图 “诗”论的不同维度相对照。接着根据“诗”之外延与内涵的历史 变迁以及古希腊传统中“诗”的职责，初步判定“柏拉图非诗”实是误解。之后， 本文主要依据柏拉图如何看待语言能否反映实在，来分析柏拉图的代表性诗论：“诗” 是对现实的“摹仿”。由此证明柏拉图的语言工具论，是造成“柏拉图非诗”观的最 根本原因；本文还揭示，柏拉图论“诗”的方式饱含了修辞性，同时就其与“诗” 的类似性，阐述其“诗”的价值。最后，本文从“逻各斯”层面转入灵魂层面去寻 求“诗”作为本真之言的根据。论文以柏拉图诗论中一个核心术语“迷狂”为透视 点，阐述其与诗的关系。即通过柏拉图关于“迷狂”的论说，领会只有由爱神引导 才能企及的“诗”之美。只有这种美才能使人在最神圣的天外和最现实的生活之间 达于和谐。 关键字：柏拉图 诗 逻各斯 摹仿 灵魂 迷狂 I 华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 Abstract Before fix attention on what the Plato’s real concept about the poetry is, the thesis investigates the Plato’s dialogue on name at first. Because Plato could not ascertain the coherence between name and the idea, he often analyzed the conventional conceptions, and the poetry is one of them. And this seemly proves the view that Plato holds a definitely negative attitude to poetry, but in fact Plato just has doubts on poetry. In the first part of the main body, the thesis clarifies the different names and means of the poetry in ancient Greece, associates them with the Plato’s statement about poetry; and from the historic change of the references of poetry and the Greek’s view about poetry, the thesis confirms that Plato hold a definitely negative attitude to poetry is impossible. In the second part, the thesis investigates Plato’s discussion on the relation between language and reality, because this investigation is very useful for the analysis about representative notion of Plato: poetry is the imitation of the real world. thus deduces the misunderstandings of Plato’s attitude to