经皮外固定架和pfna治疗老年高危股骨粗隆间骨折临床效果.docVIP

经皮外固定架和pfna治疗老年高危股骨粗隆间骨折临床效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经皮外固定架和PFNA治疗老年高危股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果   [摘要] 目的 探?并对比经皮外固定架和股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)在治疗老年高危粗隆间骨折临床效果上的差异。 方法 选取2015年1月~2017年1月60例河北省中医院骨伤科高龄高危股骨粗隆间骨折患者,其中行外固定架治疗的患者30例(A组),PFNA治疗患者30例(B组)。A组均在局麻下行经皮外固定架治疗;B组在蛛网膜下腔阻滞麻醉或全麻下行PFNA治疗,分别记录两组患者手术前后血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白(ALB)的变化,手术时间,术中出血量,术中透视次数,术后卧床时间,术后6个月Harris髋关节评分。 结果 所有患者术中均获得满意复位,外固定架对A组患者术后平卧和坐卧位活动均无影响。术后两组患者Hb及ALB下降程度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。其中A组3例患者发生Ⅱ级针道感染,经过积极抗感染和换药后均愈合。所有患者均未发生骨折位置丢失、螺钉或斯氏针退出、术后伤口感染及褥疮等并发症。 结论 外固定架治疗高龄高危股骨粗隆间骨折是一种安全、有效的治疗方法,其优势包括:简单快捷、麻醉风险低、手术时间短、术中出血少、透视次数少、固定牢固、术后卧床时间短、疼痛缓解明显、治疗成本低等。   [关键词] 股骨粗隆间骨折;外固定架;股骨近端防旋髓内钉;Harris髋关节评分   [中图分类号] R683.421 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2018)02(b)-0122-05   [Abstract] Objective To investigate and compare the clinical curative effect between the external fixation and the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in high-risk elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Methods Sixty elderly patients with high-risk of intertrochanteric fracture in Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2015 to January 2017 were selected. Patients were divided in two groups regarding to treatment. In group A (n=30), all patients were treated with external fixator under local anesthesia, while in group B (n=30) were treated with PFNA under subarachnoid anesthesia or general anesthesia. The changes of Hb and ALB before and after operation were recorded, meanwhile the operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the bed time after operation, and the Harris hip joint score at 6 months after operation were recorded. Results All patients received satisfactory reduction during operation, the fixator was well accepted and no patient had significant difficulties while sitting or lying. The decrease of Hb and ALB after operation were lower in group A than that in group B, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). 3 patients in group B had

文档评论(0)

小马过河 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档