延异辟路和记忆痕迹.pptVIP

延異、闢路與記憶痕跡 劉紀蕙 原初分歧 originary 延異 différance 闢路 Bahnung, pathbreaking, breaching, 心靈的空間化 spacing, 書寫的魔術板 記憶痕跡 memory trace 原初痕跡 archi-trace 書寫，技術 technē Jacques Derrida, “Freud and the Scene of Writing,” first published in Tel Quel, no. 26, summer 1966, collected in L’ écriture et la difference, 1967. trans. Alan Bass, Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978. 196-231. 德希達在1987年指出，20年前所提出的假設：一個路徑被開闢出來，留下了永久的痕跡，而抗拒也被克服了。而結論是：沒有痕跡，因為根本沒有抗拒。 Trace as memory is not a pure Bahnung that could be acquired again and again in a simple present. Trace is an ungraspable and invisible difference among the Bahnungs. (Derrida - Freud und der Schauplatz der Schrift in u. o.: Die Schrift und die Differenz Suhrkamp 1976, p. 308). Freud showed that delay, postponing, supplementarity are inseparable from life, while Derrida in this radical Freud interpretations criticised the time to time emerging naivity of transcription und translation, and the belief that the mind would be a motionless text. Bacsó Béla 指出，作為痕跡的記憶不是單純的Bahnung，因為此Bahnung不斷在當下發生。德希達已經在「佛洛依德與書寫場景」中指出，「痕跡」是諸多Bahnung中無法捕捉、無法辨識的差異。佛洛依德所說明的延遲、延後、增補追加的，是生命中無法區分的部分。德希達透過佛洛依德此處的基進詮釋中，批評試圖將心靈視為不動的「文本」而進行翻譯的作法。 基本概念（196-199） 德希達指出，對於佛洛依德而言，壓抑不是遺忘，不是排除，不是逃逸，不是驅逐外力。壓抑是內部的再現，是再現的空間化。(196) “Repression, not forgetting; repression, not exclusion. Repression, as Freud says, neither repels, nor flees, nor excludes an exterior force; it contains an interior representation, laying out within itself a space of repression. Here, that which represents a force in the form of the writing interior to speech and essential to it has been contained outside speech. (Derrida, “Freud and the Scene of Writing,” 196) ” An unsuccessful repression, on the road to historical dismantling. It is this dismantling that interests us, this unsuccessfulness which confers upon its becoming a certain legibility and limits its historical opaqueness.” (Derrida, “Freud and the Scene of Writing,” 196) 壓抑復返的症狀形式：書寫作為排除痕跡的西方形上學本體論隱喻，壓抑