- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理应用于放射造影检查中探究
优质护理应用于放射造影检查中的探究
【摘要】 目的 研究放射造影检查中采用优质护理的价值。方法 140例放射科接受造影检查的患者作为研究对象, 其中先入院的70例患者设为对照组, 后入院的70例患者设?楣鄄熳椤6哉兆榛颊吒?予常规护理, 观察组患者在检查全过程中给予优质护理, 对比分析两组患者的不良反应发生率、心理状况、护理满意度等指标。结果 观察组患者不良反应发生率为5.71%, 对照组患者不良反应发生率为17.14%, 观察组患者的不良反应发生率低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组焦虑发生率为15.71%, 明显低于对照组患者的31.43%, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度评分为(96.9±6.2)分, 高于对照组患者的(87.5±5.7)分, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 在放射造影检查的护理工作中渗透优质护理有助于提高检查依从性, 改善患者的心理状况, 并且在构建和谐护患关系上具有积极意义, 应得到推广和应用。
【关键词】 优质护理;放射造影检查;不良反应;护理满意度;焦虑
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.04.077
【Abstract】 Objective To research value of high quality nursing applied in radiation angiography examination. Methods A total of 140 patients receiving radiation angiography examination as study subjects were divided by their admission time into control group with 70 former patients and observation group with 70 latter patients. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received high quality nursing in examination. Comparative analysis was made on incidence of adverse reactions, psychological status, and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. Results The observation group had incidence of adverse reactions as 5.71%, and the control group had incidence of adverse reactions as 17.14%. The observation group had lower incidence of adverse reactions than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of anxiety as 15.71% than 31.43% in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had higher nursing satisfaction score as (96.9±6.2) points than (87.5±5.7) points in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Implement of high quality nursing fully in radiation angiography examination is helpful to enhance examination compliance and improve psychological status in patients. This method contains positive significance in establishing harmonious
原创力文档


文档评论(0)