延续护理对良性前列腺增生症手术患者预后的影响.docVIP

延续护理对良性前列腺增生症手术患者预后的影响 　　[摘要] 目的 研究延续护理对良性前列腺增生症（BPH）手术患者预后的影响。方法 整群选取该院2013年2月―2013年8月收治的94例BHP术后患者，抽签随机分为对照组和观察组，每组47例。对照组采取常规健康教育护理，观察组在常规护理基础上采用延续性护理。观察两组护理6个月后的自我护理能力测量评分（ESCA）、生活质量量表（SF-36）评分以及不良反应发生率。 结果 护理后观察组ESCA（148.4±18.9）分和SF-36（262.1±48.2）分相较对照组（102.4±20.1）分、（224.8±45.7）分显著较高，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组患者护理后不良反应症状发病率4.26%相较对照组17.02%显著较低，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 延续护理对良性前列腺增生症手术患者预后康复效果显著，具有临床推广价值。 　　[关键词] 延续护理；良性前列腺增生症；预后 　　[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2015）11（c）-0144-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To study the prognostic effect of continuous nursing on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia（BPH）. Methods 94 cases of BHP postoperative patients treated in our hospital from February 2013 to August 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 47 cases in each， the control group were given routine nursing care and the observation group were given continuous nursing on the basis of the control group ， self -nursing ability score （ESCA）， quality of life scale （SF-36） score and the incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups after 6 months of treatment were observed. Results After nursing， ESCA score（148.4±18.9） and SF-36 score （262.1±48.2） in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group with （102.4±20.1） and （224.8±45.7） respectively， and the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）； the incidence of adverse reactions （4.26%）after nursing in the observation group was significantly lower than （17.02%） in the control group ， and the difference was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion The effect of continuous nursing on the prognosis rehabilitation of the patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia is obvious and it has clinical popularization value. 　　[Key words] Continuous nursing； Benign prostatic hyperplasia； Prognosis 　　前列腺增生症又称前列腺肥大，是人体内雄雌激素平衡失调引起的前列腺良性病变[1]。发病机制是后尿道粘膜下的中叶或侧叶的腺组织、结缔组织及平滑组织形成混合型圆球状结节突入膀胱或尿道内，压迫膀胱颈部、尿道引起下尿路梗阻[2-3]。前列腺增生症多发于老年男性群体，常见病症为尿频、排