小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产终止早孕中临床应用分析.docVIP

小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产终止早孕中临床应用分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产终止早孕中临床应用分析

小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产终止早孕中临床应用分析   [摘要] 目的 探究小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产终止早孕中的临床疗效。方法 方便选取该院2017年1―7月自愿流产的早孕健康患者160例,随机分为观察组(84例)和对照组(76例)。对照组进行无痛人流术,观察组在无痛人流术的基础上应用卡孕栓,观察两组患者术后宫颈松弛程度、手术时间、术中出血量及术后48 h腹痛发生情况。结果 观察组5号扩宫器应用通过率为97.62%;对照组5号扩宫器应用通过率为72.05%,观察组通过率大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组出血量为(16.5±3.4)mL,对照组出血量(22.8±4.3)mL,对照组出血量大于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组手术时间相比:观察组手术时间为(5.5±1.4)min,对照组手术时间(9.5±4.3)min,对照组手术时间大于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组术后腹痛发生例数相比:对照组手术后48 h腹痛例数大于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 小剂量卡孕栓在无痛人工流产中可以有效松弛子宫颈,促进了手术顺利进行,临床获益大,值得推广。   [关键词] 卡孕栓;无痛人工流产;临床应用   [中图分类号] R74.21 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)12(b)-0150-03   [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical curative effect of small-dose carboprost in ending the early pregnancy in the painless induced abortion. Methods 160 cases of healthy early pregnant patients with voluntary abortion in our hospital were conveniently selected and randomly divided into two groups, from January to July 2017 the control group with 76 cases were treated with painless induced abortion, while the observation group with 84 case applied the carboprost on the basis of the painless induced abortion, and the postoperative cervical relaxation degree, operation time, intraoperative bleeding amount and occurrence of postoperative 48 h abdominal pain of the two groups were observed. Results The application pass rate of No. 5 diffuser in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, (97.62% vs 72.05%)(P0.05), and the difference was statistically significant, and the bleeding amount in the control group was higher than that in the observation group[(22.8±4.3)mL vs (16.5±3.4)mL], and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05), and the operation time in the control group was higher than that in the observation group, [(9.5±4.3)min vs (5.5±1.4)min], and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05), and the occurrence case of postoperative 48 h abdominal pain in the control group was higher than that in the observation group, and the differen

文档评论(0)

151****1926 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档