“问题专利”的成因、影响及法律规制法律学专业论文.docxVIP

“问题专利”的成因、影响及法律规制法律学专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
“问题专利”的成因、影响及法律规制法律学专业论文

华中科技大学硕士学位论文 华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 II II Abstract The patent system is a major incentive for social innovation. The righteousness of the patent system is based on stimulating innovation and making up for the loss on inefficiency brought by monopoly with faster innovation.Since China introduced the patent system, our social innovation capacity significantly improved. However, there have been some problems, plus the number of people blind pursuit of patent deficiencies of the patent examination system lead to a lot of “questionable patents”. The impact of “The questionable patents” on the interests of individuals and public interest aroused widespread concern. This thesis defines and categorizes the concept of “questionable patents” at the beginning. Then this essay concluded the causes how “questionable patents” are produed. The “questionable patents”are partly derived from the dysfunction of the patent system. Various factors must be taken into accout such as the competition of patent application the pursuit for the monopoly of the patent protection and the limited patent verification resources.As a result, a large number of inappropriately or illy authorized “questionable patents”have emerged. After this, this thesis elaborates the impact of “questionable patents” on the consumers welfare, fair competition, and technological innovation. The patent system in essence is to protect the exclusive rights when innovators occupy the market. This exclusive rights must be certified and accepted by a third party or an authority. However, the third party usually does not think highly of the validity of “questionable patents”, and the “questionable patents” owner tries to make rights exclusive through opportunistic litigation and anti-compellation litigation. This is a harmful behavior of rent-seeking. Last but not least, this thesis conlude the legal arrangements taken against “questionable patents” and makes some recommendations for further improvements. Key

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档