作品精神权利的可转让性问题分析-on the transferability of spiritual rights in works.docxVIP

下载本文档

7
0
约5.19万字
约 55页
2018-09-07 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

作品精神权利的可转让性问题分析-on the transferability of spiritual rights in works.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

作品精神权利的可转让性问题分析-on the transferability of spiritual rights in works

华华中科技大学硕士学位论文 II II Abstract In the age of information, Intellectual property rights have become more and more important, among which copyright is one of the most complex branches. Copyright dispute takes about 65% of intellectual property rights’ cases in judicial practice. In addition, the number of cases related to the moral rights of the work has become larger and larger, as well as the number of categories. And among them People concern much about the transferability of the moral rights. The moral rights of the work are special kinds of civil rights on theory. Being similar to intellectual property, it contains two categories of properties. On the one hand, it related to the author’s personality interests, which means personal property. On the other hand, the object of the moral rights of the work is not the personality but the work, which means property interests. Based on the two properties of the moral rights of the work (personal property, property interests), we can get the first conclusion that the moral rights of the work are transferable. They should be allowed to transfer within a certain range. In the institutional level, the problem can be divided into two aspects. On the one hand, from the cosmos level any rights reflect the cosmos of the society, the process of exercising rights must obey the order of the society. Being different from the ordinary civil rights, the moral rights of the work refers more about the culture and morality, for example, the scholarly works. As a result, theoretically, we can get the second conclusion, although the moral rights of the work are transferable, it should be strictly limited. And as a result the non-transferable of the moral rights of the work should be regarded as a principle, and as for the transferable cases, which are not violate public order principle of good morals, should be taken as exception in judicial practice. On the other hand, from the normative level, the effectiveness, stability