历史转向中科学知识社会学——库恩与社会建构主义者分歧和争论-sociology of scientific knowledge in historical turn differences and arguments between kuhn and social constructivists.docxVIP

历史转向中科学知识社会学——库恩与社会建构主义者分歧和争论-sociology of scientific knowledge in historical turn differences and arguments between kuhn and social constructivists.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
历史转向中科学知识社会学——库恩与社会建构主义者分歧和争论-sociology of scientific knowledge in historical turn differences and arguments between kuhn and social constructivists

In the third part ,we will reconstruct the main ideas of Kuhn, and based on this, go to examine the interpretation of sociology of scientific knowledge on Kuhn’s thought. In the reconstruction of historical turn, we find Historical Turn to take Time into the understanding scientific, we can see a historical dynamic picture about science. Kuhn take a analogy between the scientific development and biological evolution ,and he claims that the paradigm incommensurability does not mean denying the scientific progress. He put the thought of evolution and ecology into the understanding of scientific, so that we see clearly what role the social factors play in the development of science. In Kuhn’s holism, we found that this thought has not lead to methodological relativism inevitably. The development of sociology of scientific knowledge largely based on the excessive interpretation of Kuhn, it embodied in their deconstruction and misuse of “incommensurability” thesis and “Underdetermination” thesis, etc. Sociology of scientific knowledge extend the “shared values” out the “social interests”, it make scientific community have been divided into many small groups in which there have countless disruptions for social interests.The scientific consensus is only a product of power struggle and beneficial compromise. This conclusion fundamentally run counter to Kuhn’s thought. sociology of Scientific knowledge based on the deconstruction and misuse of Kuhn’s thought and closely related incommensurability thesis and Underdetermination thesis. Through the reduction and interpretation of two thesises, we can see that sociology of scientific knowledge will inevitably crumb! KEYWORDS: relativism, Historical turn, Incommensurability thesis, Underdetermination thesis IV 关于学位论文独创 声明和学术诚信承诺 本人向河南大学提出硕士学位申请 .本人郑重声明:所呈交的学位论文是本人在导 师的指导下独立完成的,对所研究的课题有新的见解 .据我所知,除文中特别加以说明、 标注和致谢的地方外,论文中不包括其他人已经发表或撰写过的研究成果,也不包括其 他人为获得任何教育、科研机构的学位或证书而使用过的材料.与我一同工作的同事对 本研究所做的任何贡献均已在论文中作了明确的说明并表示了谢意 . 在此本人郑重承诺:所呈

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档