- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心理干预对特发性耳鸣治疗影响
心理干预对特发性耳鸣治疗影响
[摘要] 目的 探索心理干预在特发性耳鸣治疗中的积极作用,为临床应用提供理论依据。 方法 选取2015年12月~2016年12月黄石爱康医院收治的特发性耳鸣患者66例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各33例。两组均行常规治疗(药物治疗、鼓室内注射、高压氧)。此外,观察组联合心理干预(习服、认知、掩蔽、暗示)。所有患者治疗前后分别给予汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和抑郁量表(HAMD)评分。分别比较两组患者治疗2周末和治疗结束后2个月的治疗有效率。 结果 组内比较,观察组患者治疗后的HAMA评分与HAMD评分均明显低于治疗前(P 0.05)。组间比较,两组患者治疗前HAMA评分与HAMD评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05);观察组患者治疗后的HAMA评分与HAMD评分明显低于对照组(P 0.05)。观察组患者治疗2周末和治疗结束后2个月的有效率明显高于对照组(P 0.05)。 结论 在特发性耳鸣患者的常规治疗中结合习服、认知、掩蔽、暗示心理干预手段,可以明显的改善患者的焦虑抑郁情绪,提高治疗效果。
[关键词] 特发性耳鸣;心理干预;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R76 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)09(c)-0124-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the role of psychological intervention in treatment of idiopathic tinnitus and provide the theoretical basis for clinical application. Methods From December 2015 to December 2016, 66 patients with idiopathic tinnitus in Huangshi Love Health Hospital were selected and divided into control group and observation group by random number table, with 33 cases in each group. Both groups were treated by routine treatment (drug therapy, intratympanic injection, hyperbaric oxygen). Additionally, the observation group was combined with psychological intervention (acclimatization, cognitive, masking, implied). Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) examinations were taken before and after treatment. The effective rates of two groups were compared at the end of 2-week treatment and 2 months after treatment,respectively. Results In observation group, the HAMA score and HAMD score after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P 0.05). Before treatment, there was no difference in HAMA score and HAMD score between two groups (P 0.05). After treatment, the HAMA score and HAMD score in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P 0.05). The effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group both at the end of 2-week treatment and 2 months after treatment (P 0.05). Con
文档评论(0)