椎体间植骨融合与cage植骨融合联合gss-ii内固定治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效比较-comparison of clinical efficacy between interbody fusion and cage fusion combined with gss - ii internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.docxVIP

椎体间植骨融合与cage植骨融合联合gss-ii内固定治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效比较-comparison of clinical efficacy between interbody fusion and cage fusion combined with gss - ii internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
椎体间植骨融合与cage植骨融合联合gss-ii内固定治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效比较-comparison of clinical efficacy between interbody fusion and cage fusion combined with gss - ii internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

广州医学院硕士学位论文 广州医学院硕士学位论文 4 4 disability Index and In radiographic assessmen(the index of Taillard,the relative posterior disc height and the fusion rate).All datas between the two groups were calculated by using SPSS10.0 statistical software. Results The follow-up period of group A extened from 7 months to 21 months(means 14.5 months),the follow-up period of group B extened from 9 months to 20 months(means 16 months).There were statistically significant differences between preoperation and postoperation in two groups according to JOA,VAS and ODI (p0.05),but there were no statistically significant differences between two groups (p0.05).According to Taillard Index and Relative height of veterbral space,the difference was statistically significant between preoperation and postoperation in two groups separately(P0.05),also there were statistically significant differences in follow-up between two groups(P0.05),group A was better than group B. Spinal fusion rate of group A was 100% and group B was 93.3%,there were no statistically significant differences between two groups(P0.05)。 Conclusion Both treatments have satisfactory preliminary clinical result for the treatment of the lumbar spondylolisthesis.Complete decompression,the recovery of constructive properties and stability of spine can be obtained,and the rates of reduction , improvement of symptom and complication have no significant difference.In the maintenance of intervertebral space height,the fromer was weaker than the latter. Keywords PLIF; cage; fusion; GSS-II(general spine system); lumbar spondylolisthesis 38 38 学位论文原创性声明 本人郑重声明:所呈交的学位论文,是本人在导师的指导下,独立进行研究工作所取得 的成果。文中依法引用他人的成果、对本文的研究作出重要贡献的个人和集体,均已在文中 做出明确标注或得到许可。论文内容未包含法律意义上已属于他人的任何形式的研究成果, 也不包含本人已用于其他学位申请的论文或成果。 本人如违反上述声明,愿意承担以下责任和后果: 1.交回学校授予的学位证书; 2.学校可在相关媒体上对作者本人的行为进行通报; 3.本人按照学校规定的方式,对因不当取得学位给学校造成的名誉损害,进行公开道歉。 4.本人负责因论文成果不实产生的法律纠纷。 论文作者签名: 日期: 年 月 日 学位论文知识产权权属声明 本人在导师指导下所完成的论文及相关的职务作品,知识产权归属广州医学院及附属单 位。广州医学院及附属单位享有以任何方式发表

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档