自制负压引流器在预防剖宫产术后切口感染中的应用体会.docVIP

自制负压引流器在预防剖宫产术后切口感染中的应用体会.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
自制负压引流器在预防剖宫产术后切口感染中的应用体会   【摘要】 目的 探讨自制负压引流器在剖宫产术后预防切口感染中的疗效。方法 120例行剖宫产手术患者, 随机分为观察组和对照组, 每组60例。术后切口放置自制负压引流器患者作为观察组, 术后行常规缝合患者作为对照组, 术后两组患者均常规合理使用抗生素治疗。比较两组患者术后切口感染情况及切口愈合时间。结果 两组年龄、孕周、手术时间及术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组剖宫产术后出现切口红肿6例, 发生率为10.0%, 切口感染2例, 发生率为3.3%, 切口愈合时间(7.12±2.56)d。对照组剖宫产术后切口红肿15例, 发生率25.0%, 切口感染8例, 发生率13.33%, 切口愈合时间(11.76±3.67)d。两组切口红肿、切口感染、切口愈合时间比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 自制负压引流器对剖宫产术后患者可以有效的降低术后切口感染率, 并缩短切口愈合时间, 可在临床推广。   【关键词】 自制负压引流器;剖宫产;切口感染   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.07.098   Application experience of self-made vacuum drainage apparatus in prevention of postoperative incision infection in cesarean section SUN Xiu-jie. Department of Obstetrics, Inner Mongolia Ulanqab City Central Hospital, Ulanqab 012000, China   【Abstract】 Objective To investigate curative effect by self-made vacuum drainage apparatus in prevention of postoperative incision infection in cesarean section. Methods A total of 120 patients in cesarean section were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The observation group received postoperative self-made vacuum drainage apparatus placement in incision, and the control group received conventional postoperative suture. Both groups received general antibiotic therapy after operation. Comparison was made on postoperative incision infection status and incision healing time between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference of age, gestational weeks, operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume between the two groups (P0.05). In the observation group, there were 6 cases with incision inflammation after cesarean section, with incidence as 10.0%, and 2 cases with incision infection with incidence as 3.3%, and it had incision healing time as (7.12±2.56) d. In the control group, there were 15 cases with incision inflammation after cesarean section, with incidence as 25.0%, and 8 cases with incision infection with incidence as 13.3%, and it had

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

小马过河 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档