护理干预对非小细胞肺癌晚期化学治疗患者生存质量影响.docVIP

护理干预对非小细胞肺癌晚期化学治疗患者生存质量影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理干预对非小细胞肺癌晚期化学治疗患者生存质量影响

护理干预对非小细胞肺癌晚期化学治疗患者生存质量影响   [摘要] 目的 探?护理干预对非小细胞肺癌晚期化学治疗患者生存质量的影响。 方法 从我院2015年5月~2016年5月期间收治的非小细胞肺癌晚期患者中随机抽取82例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为两组:对照组41例患者给予常规化学治疗和护理,观察组41例患者在对照组的基础上加以综合性护理干预,采用肺癌患者生存质量测定量表(FACT-L)第四版统计两组患者护理前后生存质量,统计不良反应发生情况。 结果 两组护理前的生活质量指标比较无显著差异(P0.05);观察组护理后的情感状况评分和附加的关注情况评分较护理前显著提高(P0.05)。观察组消化道反应、骨髓抑制、肾毒性、神经毒性及皮肤黏膜损伤发生率分别为29.27%、19.51%、12.20%、14.63%、19.51%,均较对照组显著降低(P0.05)。 结论 在化学治疗同时给予非小细胞肺癌晚期患者综合护理干预措施,可显著提高患者生存质量,降低不良反应发生率。   [关键词] 非小细胞肺癌;护理干预;生存质量;化学治疗   [中图分类号] R473.73 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)08-134-04   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of nursing intervention on quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy. Methods 82 cases of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer cured in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were randomly selected as the study objects. According to random digital table method, they were divided into control group and observation group with 41 cases in each. Patients in control group were treated with routine chemotherapy and nursing care, and patients in observation group were treated with comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of control group. Lung cancer patients quality of life scale (FACT-L) Fourth Edition was used to quality of life of two groups of patients before and after treatment, statistical adverse reactions. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups before nursing quality of life (P0.05). The scores of emotional status and additional attention in the observation group were significantly higher than those before nursing (P0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal reaction, bone marrow suppression, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and skin mucosal injury in the observation group were 29.27%, 19.51%, 12.20%, 14.63%, and 19.51%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (P   [Key words] Non small cell lung cancer; Nursing intervention; Quality of life; Chemotherapy   化学治疗是中

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档