浅谈护理干预对尘肺病患者影响.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
浅谈护理干预对尘肺病患者影响

浅谈护理干预对尘肺病患者影响   【摘要】 目的:探究护理干预对尘肺患者的影响。方法:选取2011年3-10月在本院住院疗养的210例被诊断为尘肺的患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为干预组和对照组,每组各105例。对照组只给予常规的治疗及护理措施,干预组则在对照组的基础上采取院内、外连续约12个月的心理干预、生活指导、环境管理、营养支持及肺功能康复锻炼等全方位的多种护理干预。观察两组患者护理干预前后肺功能、动脉血气分析、生活质量评价及护理干预相关内容认知度,并做统计学分析。结果:干预组干预后FEV1、FEV1/FVC和PaO2均明显高于干预前及对照组干预后,SGRQ评分明显低于干预前及对照组干预后,患者对于相关知识的认知度明显优于干预前及对照组干预后,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对尘肺患者实施院内、外连续性的综合性护理干预,可减轻其临床症状,控制并发症的产生,避免肺功能的进一步损伤,对提高患者的活动耐力及生存信心有积极作用。   【关键词】 尘肺; 护理干预; 影响   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the effect of nursing intervention on patients with pneumoconiosis.Method:210 patients who were diagnosed as pneumoconiosis admitted to our hospital from March 2011 to October 2011 were selected and divided into the intervention group and the control group according to the random number table method,105 cases in each group.The control group was given routine treatment and nursing measures,the intervention group was given comprehensive nursing intervention in all directions in and outside the hospital,such as the psychological intervention,life guidance,environmental management,nutrition support,pulmonary function rehabilitation exercise and so on for over 12 months consecutively.The pulmonary function,arterial blood gas analysis,quality of life and cognition of nursing intervention related content were observed and statistically analyzed before and after nursing intervention between the two groups.Result:The FEV1,FEV1/FVC and PaO2 of the intervention group after intervention were significantly higher than before intervention and those of the control group after intervention,the SGRQ score of the intervention group after intervention was significantly lower than before intervention and that of the control group after intervention,the recognition of patients with relevant knowledge in the intervention group after intervention was significantly better than before intervention and that in the control group after intervention,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:The

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档