血清抗体检测在炎症性肠病中临床应用研究.docVIP

血清抗体检测在炎症性肠病中临床应用研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
血清抗体检测在炎症性肠病中临床应用研究

血清抗体检测在炎症性肠病中临床应用研究   【摘要】 目的 研究抗胰腺外分泌腺抗体(PAB)、抗酿酒酵母抗体(ASCA)、抗杯状细胞抗体(GAB)及抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(pANCA)在炎症性肠病(IBD)诊断与鉴别诊断中的意义。方法 间接免疫荧光生物薄片法测定UC组[30例溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者]、CD组[22例克罗恩病(CD)患者]及正常对照组(20例健康体检者)血清中四种血清学抗体的表达。结果 pANCA在UC组阳性率(56.7%)高于CD组(9.1%)和正常对照组(5.0%)(P0.05);GAB在正常对照组及IBD患者中均未见表达;PAB在CD组阳性率(27.3%)高于UC组(0)和正常对照组(0)(P0.05);ASCA在CD组阳性率(45.5%)高于UC组(3.3%)和正常对照组(0)(P0.05)。pANCA检测诊断IBD敏感性为36.5%, 特异性为95.0%;GAB、PAB及ASCA单项检测诊断IBD敏感性较低, 分别为0、11.5%、21.2%, 但其诊断IBD特异性较高为100.0%。结论 pANCA、GAB、PAB及ASCA在IBD诊断中敏感性低, 特异性高。   【关键词】 炎症性肠病;克罗恩病;溃疡性结肠炎;抗体   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.26.001   【Abstract】 Objective To research significance by anti-pancreatic antibody (PAB), anti-sacchromyces cerevisia antibody (ASCA), anti-goblet cell antibody (GAB) and perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Indirect immunofluorescent biological chip test was applied to detect expression of four serum antibodies in UC group [30 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)], CD group [22 patients with Crohns disease (CD)] and normal control group (20 healthy people). Results Positive rate of pANCA was higher in UC group (56.7%) than CD group (9.1%) and normal control group (5.0%) (P0.05). GAB was not shown in normal control group and IBD patients. PAB had higher positive rate in CD group (27.3%) than UC group (0) and normal control group (0) (P0.05). Positive rate of ASCA was higher in CD group (45.5%) than UC group (3.3%) and normal control group (0) (P0.05). Detection of pANCA showed sensibility as 36.5% and specificity as 95.0% in diagnosis of IBD. Single detection of GAB, PAB and ASCA showed low sensibility in diagnosing IBD as 0, 11.5% and 21.2%. Specificity by detection of the four antibodies was high as 100.0% in diagnosing IBD. Conclusion In diagnosis of IBD, pANCA, GAB, PAB and ASCA contain low sensibility but high specificity.   【Key words】 Inflammatory bowel disease; Crohns disease; Ulcerative coli

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档