毒品犯罪诱惑侦查实证分析-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

significantly high. To be specific, the three main types were positive-response, repeated- temptation and quantitate- temptation. Secondly, the micro aspect demonstrates to be randomly operated, less excluded of illegal evidence, almost collected from the residents report, and targeting about temptation objects when implementing temptation detect. It is worthwhile to conclude that a majority of the cases trials adopting simple procedure and were judged to relative short sentences. The third part consists of the main problems and reason analysis of drug crime temptation detect. In terms of empirical analysis, there are two significant problems in China: on one hand, the relevant laws and rules are ambiguous and lack of plausible support, on the other hand, the detect behavior is out of order and lack of constraints. A variety of explanations could be found, for example, the ambiguous legislative provisions, the imperfect effective regulation program, the dilemma of eliminating illegal evidence and the difference of judicial environments. The last part of the main contents concerns the institutionalized framework and construction of drug crime temptation detect. Specifically, it could be illustrated in there aspects: firstly, be aware of the legal limit of temptation detect, that is, to exclude lure criminal intent subjectively and standardize the detect degree objectively，especially to the young adults combined with strong basis on empirical practice; secondly, implementing an effective procedure and regulation system, which includes clear criterions and application scope, perfect examination and approval procedures, strict execution of monitor procedures during whole process; thirdly, to establish a scientific assessment methods and adjust it towards the actual situation. Key words: drug crime; temptation detect; empirical research  目 录  HYPERLINK \l _bookmark0 引 言 .................................................................. 1  HYPERLINK \l _bookmark1 一