对PatentTroll的法律分析及我国相关制度的完善-法律专业论文.docxVIP

对PatentTroll的法律分析及我国相关制度的完善-法律专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
对PatentTroll的法律分析及我国相关制度的完善-法律专业论文

华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 Abstract Chinese corporation was accused by the Patent Troll during Chinese corporation exploited the international market. The Chinese corporations did not encounter Patent Troll formerly, and there is no any research about the Patent Troll in mainland. This thesis takes the litigation of huawei and ZTE accused by the Traffic Information LLC which been called as the Patent Troll. Because the Patent Troll does not manufacture or sale products, patent cross license is not useful for settlement of the disputes. Firstly, the thesis analyzes the relationship of economic and the strength of patent protection base on the evolution of the U.S. patent system; then analyzes the Patent Troll generation and the legal profession point of view of its positive and negative evaluation. Final, gives the basic ideas of the thesis, recognizes the Patent Troll as a businessman, Investment patent and obtain a reasonable license fee,even the use of patent litigation obtain a reasonable licensing fee as a means of relief there is reasonable. The law need to adjust use litigation based on junk patent for unreasonable behavior. The thesis further analyzes the root cause of Patent Troll is poor quality and the current patent gives the patent holder for the relief too strong. the thesis analyzes the evolution of U.S. patent relief system, the relevant judicial precedents and the importance of the patent reform bill, and American judicial and legislative amendments to prohibition order issued by the principles, the principle of compensation is calculated, and the patent is invalid and changes in the system changes, and gives the view reduce the incentive for malicious litigation and ways to improve patent quality. Finally, the thesis compares the stop infringement of china with the United States a permanent injunction, and compares the pretrial prohibition order of china with the preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order of American, and made sure of the

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档