一项网络问卷查:女同性恋者与双性恋者的妊娠丢失.pptVIP

  • 1
  • 0
  • 约3.27万字
  • 约 42页
  • 2018-10-14 发布于江苏
  • 举报

一项网络问卷查:女同性恋者与双性恋者的妊娠丢失.ppt

一项网络问卷查:女同性恋者与双性恋者的妊娠丢失

Pregnancy loss in lesbian and bisexual women: an online survey of experiences 一项网络问卷调查研究:女同性恋者与双性恋者的妊娠丢失 background: Although pregnancy loss is a distressing health event for many women, research typically equates women’s experiences of pregnancy loss to ‘married heterosexual women’s experiences of pregnancy loss’. The objective of this study was to explore lesbian and bisexual women’s experiences of miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death. 虽然妊娠丢失对于大多数妇女是让人痛苦的事件,这里却只是针对正常男女婚配的妇女来说的,而本文旨在针对研究女同性恋者与双性恋者妇女的妊娠丢失、死胎、新生儿死亡事件。 methods: This study analysed predominantly qualitative online survey data from 60 non-heterosexual, mostly lesbian, women from theUK,USA,Canada and Australia. All but one of the pregnancies was planned. Most respondents had physically experienced one early miscarriage during their first pregnancy, although a third had experienced multiple losses. 这份调查源于60位非异性恋者的网上调查数据,这些非异性恋者主要为女同性恋,囊括英、美、加、澳四地同性恋妇女。所有妊娠多为计划内妊娠,大多数受调查者的首次妊娠时就发生了早期流产,三分之一患者还经历多次妊娠丢失。 results: The analysis highlights three themes: processes and practices for conception; amplification of loss; and health care and heterosexism. Of the respondents, 84% conceived using donor sperm; most used various resources to plan conception and engaged in preconception health care.The experience of loss was amplified due to contextual factors and the investment respondents reported making in impending motherhood. Most felt that their loss(es) had made a ‘significant’/‘very significant’ impact on their lives.Many respondents experienced health care during their loss. Although the majority rated the overall standard of care as ‘good’/‘very good’/‘outstanding’, a minority reported experiencing heterosexism from health professionals. 本研究强调三点:1怀孕过程与治疗2流产影响的扩大化3健康护理与受歧视带来的影响。84%受调查者使用精子库精子受孕,大多数利用各种资源准备妊娠并参加孕前健康护理。流产影响的扩大化除了与上文提到的三点有关,还与受调查者为受孕进行的多种投入有关。许多妇女认为妊娠丢失在她们的生活中会产生“重要”“非常重要”的影响。许多受调查者在妊娠丢失时正在接受健康护理等治疗。虽然大多数认为护理整体标准“不错”“很好”“特别好”,但仍有少数称在护理专业人员那里受到了歧视。 conclusions: The main limitation was that t

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档