第4章+Chapter+4+The+company+form.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共53页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Topic list 1. Distinction between sole traders, partnerships and companies 2. Limited liability of members 3. Types of company 4. Effect of legal personality 5. Ignoring separate personality----lifting the veil of the company Sole trdder Salomon v. Salomon Co Ltd. Facts: Mr. Salomon was a prosperous leather merchant, who decided to convert his business into limited company. He incorporated Salomon Co Limited, with himself, his wife and his five children as directors. The company purchased the business and SC Ltd had to pay for the business: The company ran into financial difficulties, and the debenture holders appointed a receiver. The receiver sold off all of the companys assets, which were sufficient to pay off the debenture holders, but nothing was left for the unsecured creditors. Imagine whether S would be awarded the assets owed by SC Ltd ? Why? S was separate from SC Ltd (veil) he was a secured creditor (through the debenture) It established that a company is a separate legal entity a separate legal entity gives rise to many of its characteristics the most important of them is limited liability for the members of the company What is company? (1) Definition of company (2) Definition of legal personality It is a common law principle that grants a company a legal entity, separate from the members who comprise it. It is the veil. (3) Consequences of separate personality (a) Limited liability: limited to the nominal value of the shares who helds. (b) Perpetual succession: any change in its membership cant change the company’s existence and the company ceases to exist only when it is formally wound up. (c) The company owns the business property in its own right: shareholders own shares, they do not own the assets of the business they have invested in (Macaura v Northern Assurance (1925)). (d) The company has contractual capacity its own right and can sue and be sued in its own name: members are not able to bind the company. The rule in Foss v Harbottl

文档评论(0)

wx171113 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档