原创力文档- 1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次， 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
有关合作成立股票公司临时协议书
PAGE
- PAGE 42 -
AB
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
AB
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
HCA 1813 / 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO. 1813 OF 2003
BETWEEN
POON HIAO YEN
Plaintiff
and
KWOK WOOD YAN
1st Defendant
FONG SHIK YEE
2nd Defendant
TIFFIT SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED
3rd Defendant
Coram: Before Deputy High Court Judge Au in Court
Dates of Trial: 22, 23, 31 July 1 August 2008
Dates of supplemental written submissions: 7 and 15 August 2008
Date of Handing Down Judgment: 13 October 2008
JUDGMENT
I. Introduction
Under an agreement in Chinese entitled “有關合作成立股票公司臨時協議書” and dated 18 August 2001 (“the Share Purchase Agreement”), Ms Poon (the Plaintiff) as purchaser paid Mr Kwok (the 1st Defendant) and his wife Ms Fong (the 2nd Defendant) as vendors HK$1,500,000 to purchase 1,500,000 shares in Tiffit Securities (Hong Kong) Limited (the 3rd Defendant) (“Tiffit”). At the time of the agreement, Mr Kwok and Ms Fong were the directors and only shareholders of Tiffit.
The 1,500,000 shares in Tiffit were never issued to Ms Poon.
By way of this action issued on 21 May 2003, Ms Poon asks for the repayment of HK$1,500,000 for total failure of consideration, or alternatively as damages for Mr Kwok and Ms Fong’s breach of the agreement.
Although accepting that no shares in Tiffit have been issued or transferred to Ms Poon, Mr Kwok and Ms Fong defend the claim on the following principal grounds:
Ms Poon herself had prevented the issue of the 1.5 million Tiffit’s shares (which at that time constituted more than 10% of the issued capital of Tiffit) to her by failing to return a questionnaire to their appointed accountant to provide the necessary information. As such they were unable to apply to the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) for approval (as required by
文档评论（0）