多皮饮联合生物共振治疗慢性荨麻疹的临床观察-中医外科专业论文.docxVIP

  • 5
  • 0
  • 约4.65万字
  • 约 44页
  • 2018-10-21 发布于上海
  • 举报

多皮饮联合生物共振治疗慢性荨麻疹的临床观察-中医外科专业论文.docx

多皮饮联合生物共振治疗慢性荨麻疹的临床观察-中医外科专业论文

— — PAGE 1— 摘 要 多皮饮联合生物共振治疗慢性荨麻疹 的临床观察 研究生:马壮年 导师:刘红霞主任医师 摘 要 目的:通过多皮饮联合生物共振对脾虚湿滞型慢性荨麻疹的治疗,观察对其临 床症状及生活质量的影响,从而为临床提供有效的治疗手段。方法:将符合观察标 准的脾虚湿滞型慢性荨麻疹患者根据随机、对照的原则,分为 3 组,治疗组采用中 药多皮饮联合生物共振治疗,对照 1 组为中药多皮饮内服组,对照 2 组为生物共振 治疗组。分别在治疗前后进行临床症状评分、生活质量评分。结果:(1)治疗组总 有效率明显高于对照 1 组、对照 2 组(P0.05),对照 1 组与对照 2 组比较无差异 (P0.05);(2)治疗后,治疗组临床症状总评分明显低于对照 1 组和对照 2 组(P0.05), 对照 1 组和对照 2 组无统计学差异(P0.05);治疗组在风团数目、风团大小、瘙 痒程度、发作次数及持续时间方面评分均低于对照 1 组和对照 2 组(P0.05),对 照 1 组和对照 2 组各项症状评分无统计学差异(P0.05);(3)治疗后,治疗组生 活质量总评分明显低于对照 1 组和对照 2 组(P0.05),对照1 组和对照2 组无统 计学差异;治疗组在瘙痒、尴尬、护理、社交、运动、睡眠、购物等方面生活质量 评分均低于对照 1 组、对照 2 组(P0.05 )。结论:多皮饮联合生物共振治疗慢性荨 麻疹能提高临床疗效,改善其临床症状及生活质量,表明采用此方案治疗安全,有 效。 关键词:多皮饮;生物共振;慢性荨麻疹;临床观察 新疆医科大学医学硕士学位论文 Clinical Observation Of Duo Pi Yin Decoction Combined With Bioresonance In The Treatment Of Chronic Urticaria Postgraduate: ZhuangNian Ma Supervisor: Associate Pro. HongXia Liu Abstract Objective:Through the clinical observation of the damp-retention due to hypo- function of the spleen style Chronic urticaria patient’s life quality and clinical symptom with the method of combination of traditional Chinese drug and bio-reasonance,with the hope of providing efficient therapeutic tool for clinical.Method:Divide the damp- retention due to hypo-function of the spleen style chronic urticaria patients who are fitting observation standard into 3 groups according to random and comparative principle. Therapy group adapts the treatment method combined with traditional Chinese drug and bio-reasonance. “Comparison 1” group adapts the treatment method of drinking traditional Chinese drug and “Comparison 2”group adapts the treatment method of bio-reasonance. Score the clinical symptom and life quality respectively before and after the treatment. Result: (1)The generous efficiency of the therapy group is obviously higher than “Comparison 1”group and “Comparison 2 “group(P0.05),“Comparison 1” group and “Comparison 2”group are almost same(P0.05); (2)After the treatment, the general comment of therapy group

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档