- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
常见的高英 logic fallacy 八大逻辑谬误
Logical Fallacies 错误的推理 11-1BS 彭秀秀 Eight Types of Fallacy Dicto simpliciter 绝对判断 Hasty generalization 草率结论 Post hoc 牵强附会 Contradictory premises 矛盾前提 Ad misericordiam 文不对题 False analogy 错误类比 Hypothesis contrary to fact 与事实相反的假设 Poisoning the well 井下放毒 Dicto simpliciter 绝对判断 Exercise is good,so everybody should exercise. No! Dicto simpliciter 绝对判断 Exercise is good,so everybody should exercise. No! It means an argument based on an unqualified generalization. 即将普遍规则运用于有特殊情况发生 的个别情形之中。 Hasty generalization 草率结论 Fred, the Australian, stole my wallet. Thus, all Australians are thieves. No! Hasty generalization 草率结论 Fred, the Australian, stole my wallet. Thus, all Australians are thieves. No! It applies a special case to general rule. 由个别情形来推断普遍规则. Post hoc 牵强附会 McDonalds and KFC offer foods with little nutrition, and thus we cannot expect any fast food restaurant to provide us with nutritious foods. No! Post hoc 牵强附会 McDonalds and KFC offer foods with little nutrition, and thus we cannot expect any fast food restaurant to provide us with nutritious foods. No! The cause has no connection with the result. 原因和结果没有必然联系 He decided to give up all his decisions. No! Contradictory premises 矛盾前提 When the premises of an argument contradict each other, there can be no argument. 当论证的前提相互矛盾时,这立论便不能成立。 We hope youll accept our recommendations. We spent the last three months working extra time on it. No! The answer has no connection with the question. Ad misericordiam 文不对题 Young children are like flowers---flowers should stay away from terrible weather to grow, so children need to get rid of everything negative. No! Making an analogy between different things. False analogy 错误类比 If I had studied harder, I would definitely have passed that test . No! Drawing any supportable conclusion from a hyperthesis that is not ture. Hypothesis contrary to fact 与事实相反的假设
文档评论(0)