- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
单侧椎弓根钉内固定结合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效剖析
单侧椎弓根钉内固定结合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效剖析
[摘要] 目的:探讨单侧椎弓根钉内固定结合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及优势。方法:在2006年3月~2009年2月期间对52例腰椎间盘突出症的患者采用了内固定椎间融合器治疗,其中单侧椎弓根固定组24例,双侧椎弓根固定组28例。比较两种手术患者手术前后日本骨科协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)及腰痛指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数、住院费用、融合率的情况。结果:术后随访12~20个月(平均16个月),两组患者术前JOA和ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),末次随访时的JOA及ODI评分、融合率的差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者术后的功能参数均优于术前。单侧椎弓根固定组在手术时间、出血量、住院费用方面优于双侧椎弓根固定组(P<0.01)。结论:单侧椎弓根钉内固定结合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症能够取得同双侧椎弓根钉内固定相同的手术效果,而且能够减少手术创伤,适于在临床应用。
[关键词] 腰椎间盘突出症;单侧;椎间融合术
[中图分类号] R681.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(a)-047-03
Effects of lumbar interbody fusion combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation on lumbar disc herniation
ZHOU Lianjun, LIU Yan, LI Haiyan
Department of Orthopaedics, Duodao People′s Hospital of Jingmen City, Hubei Province, Jingmen 448124, China
[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of internal fixation with unilateral pedicle screws combined with intervertebral fusion in lumbar disc herniation. Methods: From march 2006 to February 2009, 52 patients with disc herniation were treated by internal fixation and intervertebral fusion device, there was 24 cases in internal fixation with unilateral radix arcus vertebrae group and 28 cases in fixation with bilateral radix arcus vertebrae group. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, operation time, blood loss, hospital days, cost of hospitalization, fusion rate were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients were followed up from 12 to 20 months (average was 16 months). There was no significant difference of the preoperative JOA and ODI scores between the two groups (P>0.05); in the last follow-up visiting, there was no significant difference of fusion rate, JOA and ODI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative data of all patients were significantly better than those before surgery. The operation time, blood loss and cost of h
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 强迫障碍的相关护理.docx VIP
- 高标准基本农田项目中测绘的重难点及应对策略.pdf VIP
- 经典规范的股权代持协议.docx VIP
- 铜转炉渣湿法回钴.doc VIP
- 2025年教师科学考试试题及答案.doc
- 中国茶文化PPT课件教学.pptx VIP
- ASHRAE-TC9.9-2016数据中心功率设备热管理手册及实践Data Center Power Equipment Thermal Guidelines and Best Practices.pdf
- 手术室护理查房.ppt VIP
- (统编2026新教材)三年级道法上册第4课《科技力量大》课件.pptx
- IT运维综合管理平台建设方案.doc VIP
文档评论(0)