论英美刑法中的严格责任犯罪及其对中国刑事诉讼证明制度.DOCVIP

【法宝引证码】 CLI.A.1242560? 原文链接： HYPERLINK /qikan/f5a4839b665c232896baeeca5600b6debdfb.html \t _blank /qikan/f5a4839b665c232896baeeca5600b6debdfb.html 论英美刑法中的严格责任犯罪及其对中国刑事诉讼证明制度的价值  期刊名称： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyclass?ClassCodeKey=6, \t _blank 《河北法学》 期刊年份： HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?FilterItems.JournalYear=2010 \t _blank 2010 摘要： 严格责任犯罪源于英美刑法，有着其自身本土性和历史性的特定内涵。因为其构罪原理与我国通说的犯罪构成理论相异甚远，因而在实体法上没有加以引进的空间和借鉴的意义。然而制度虽有不同，却无法避免需要面对相同的问题。在追究行为人刑事责任的条件上，到底应该如何应对一些主观状态难以证明的犯罪类型，这是任何制度框架内都要解决的实际问题。在追求效率与正义的博弈中，是放弃主观要件的存在，还是在审视其证明所要付出的超常代价的基础上进行证明环节上的局部修正？严格责任犯罪给我们的启示就是对于一些特殊类型的犯罪，我们必须正视其主观要件的难以证明性，从而寻求特殊的证明方式，以期实现效率与正义的最佳平衡。 英文摘要： The concept of strict liability crime originated from Anglo-American criminal law, which has its own locality and specific historical connotation. Because of a huge gap in principles of crime constitution between it and the generally accepted one in our country, there is no room of the introduction and adoptability in the substantial law. However, they cannot avoid dealing with the same issue although they are in different systems. On the condition of holding criminal responsibility for perpetrators, how to cope with the criminal type whose subjective state proved with difficulty is an actual problem needed to be settled down in any institutional framework. What we draw inspiration from strict liability crime is that, for some special criminal types, we must face up to the proved difficulty of subjective elements, thus special modes of proofing can he sought, and an optimal state of balance between efficiency and justice can be achieved on time. 作者： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyauthor?author=刘亚娜 \t _blank 刘亚娜 中文关键词： HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?ExtCondition.InfoKeyword=严格责任犯罪 \t _blank 严格责任犯罪 HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?ExtCondition.InfoKeyword=中国刑事法律制度 \t _blank 中国刑事法律制度 HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?ExtCondition.InfoKeyword=特别辩护权 \t _blank 特别辩护权 英文关键词： strict responsibility crime; Peoples Republic of Chinas criminal justice