网络市场分析解析ppt模板跟全球社交网站商业前景分析解析enterp.pptVIP

* * * * http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/?arp=0x0022053f http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/kultur/literatur_und_kunst/ordnung_und_unordnung_des_wissens_1.4941730.html * * * * Most contribution systems offer no financial compensation to contributors. In fact, payment can destroy participation by undermining a sense of collaboration and trust. Rather, they rely on motivations intrinsic to humanity—or involve contributions that require no motivation at all, because the user contributes without realizing it. I’m contributing??Some systems collect participants’ resources or data as a by-product of things people are doing for other purposes. As shoppers buy from Amazon, they automatically contribute to its recommendation engine, which suggests products based on the ratings and purchase decisions of other customers. Practical solutions.?In some systems, participants contribute in order to get reasonably immediate rewards. For example, the site Del.icio.us enables users to organize their bookmarks of websites. A by-product of this activity is that, when aggregated, the bookmarks produce an index to the web that is valuable to others. Social reward.?Many systems provide the benefits of interaction with others: being part of a community with a common interest, generating business prospects, getting a date—the drivers behind social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn. Reputation.?Contribution can be sparked by a desire for public recognition, like Amazon’s badge for a “top 1,000 reviewer,” or for the admiration of peers: Wikipedia articles carry no authorship credit, yet authors earn the respect of other contributors. Self-expression.?Many user contribution systems thrive on individuals’ desire to air their thoughts, opinions, or creative expression, with the possibility of real-time feedback from users—witness the six million videos on YouTube. Altruism.?Why would a person write a glowing online review of a restaurant—when it may become harder to get a table if others act on the opinion