公证证据保全效力研究诉讼法学专业论文.docx

1 1 2 2 Abstract In recent years, evidence through notary organ preservation has been has been effectively used in civil lawsuit. At the same time, that notarization evidence is confronted with validity dilemma, therefore, the problems and the reason behind should be figured out in an effort to reform and improve the current approach, thus further better take the advantages of notaries evidence preservation and alleviate the burden of the judicial referee. Currently, through notary organ preservation of evidence are widely applied in the field of civil litigation is increasingly frequent; effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, also conducive to lighten the burden of the court. Unfortunately, notarization system in the judicial system in a marginalized position, notarization in judicial voice faint in the theory of law, even if the notaries evidence preservation in the social practice development faster, also did not cause people to deeply studied and discussed the effect of interest, this mainly displays in two aspects: first, the current research stay in for the notarization notaries partial summary of practical experience and exploration level, lack of summary and analysis to the real operation condition of system; Second, theoretical analysis of the material evidence preservation effect from the existing legal provisions of China, and most of the conclusion of completeness, and have the same phenomenon. To better clarify the notaries evidence preservation in the judicial practice, the application of the status quo, related laws and regulations on thorough analysis of notaries evidence preservation effect and explain the difference between, therefore, the article choose the notaries evidence preservation effect as the research subject, hope to be a contribution to the research in this field. This paper is divided into three parts, namely, preface, text and epilogue, with a total size of more than thirty thousand words, and twenty