附加剥夺政治权利刑期执行的立法完善-法律·刑法学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 剥夺政治权利在刑期执行过程中存在诸多问题，影响了剥夺政治权利这一资 格刑的刑罚作用，其中最突出的是附加剥夺政治权利刑期的执行过程中存在数个 有期自由刑部分剥夺政治权利数罪并罚时出现的罪刑不一致，违背罪刑法定原则 的问题。学界对该问题提出了诸如：分段并罚、分段执行；按比例确定执行刑期 并分别执行等解决方案，但均没有从根本上解决问题，反而存在计算复杂，执行 困难等弊端。附加剥夺政治权利刑期执行存在问题的根本原因是我国刑法第 58 条的规定将附加剥夺政治权利刑期的执行与主刑的执行捆绑在一起：刑期执行的 起算时间是主刑执行完毕或假释之日，附加剥夺政治权利当然适用于主刑执行期 间而又不算附加剥夺政治权利的刑期。刑法第 58 条的这种规定还导致附加剥夺 政治权利在刑期执行过程中出现诸如犯罪分子在适用缓刑，被假释时出现与现行 刑法规定不协调等情况。要从根本上解决这一问题，惟有对刑法第 58 条进行适 当修改，笔者建议将附加剥夺政治权利刑期的执行从判决确定之日起计算，并将 当然适用于主刑执行期间的附加剥夺政治权利期限明确确定为附加剥夺政治权 利的刑期。同时完善附加剥夺政治权利的刑期折抵、减刑等制度，从而形成完整、 科学的附加剥夺政治权利刑期执行的体系。 关键词：剥夺政治权利 附加刑 数罪并罚 有期徒刑 刑罚裁量 执行 II II ABSTRACT There are lot of problems in the process of executing the penalty of depriving political rights, which seriously affect the function of this kind of penalty, the core of these problems is that, there are several penalties of depriving political rights about fixedterm imprisonment in the process of executing the penalty of depriving political rights. When we decide the combined pinishment for several crimes, it will bring out the following problems: the in accommodation between the crime and penalty; the violation of the principle of legality. Some scholars bring forward a series of solutions to solve these problems, such as deciding the combined pinishment subsectively; executing the penalty subsectively; ascertaining the term of the penalty proportionally and executing the penalty subsectively. But these projects can’t solve the problems radically, on the contrary, they produce such shortcomings as the complicity of accouting and difficulty to execute. The essential reason for the problems existing in the process of executing the penalty of depriving political rights is that, Artical 58 in our penalty code priscribe the term of depriving political rights and the primary penalty together, which leads to the following result: the beginning time of executing the penalty of depriving political rights is behind of the end of the primary penalty or the parole, in the prcess of executing the prim