网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

单髁置换与胫骨高位截骨治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价-关节疾病与运动损伤专业论文.docx

单髁置换与胫骨高位截骨治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价-关节疾病与运动损伤专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共39页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
单髁置换与胫骨高位截骨治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价-关节疾病与运动损伤专业论文

广州医科大学硕士论文单髁置换与胫骨高位截骨治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价 广州医科大学硕士论文 单髁置换与胫骨高位截骨治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价 PAGE PAGE 10 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee:a systematic review ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of unicondylar medial arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)、PubMed、EMbase、CBMdisc、CNKI、VIP and web site of some clinical trials.Relevant journals were also hand searched to July 2012.We collected controlled trials comparing unicondylar medial arthroplasty(UKA) with high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee .Study selection and quality assessment,data extraction and analyses were undertaken by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions.Meta-analyses were also performed. Results: 8 clinical trials involving 530 eligible patients were included, which contained 259 assigned to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and 271 assigned to high tibial osteotomy(HTO). The average age of the UKA group was 66.2 years (56-80 years old),while the HTO group was 60.8 years (53-78 years old).We compared the UKA group to HTO group from the outcomes, complications and revision, the meta-analysis results were as followed: the postoperative joint function excellent rate of UKA group was higher than that of HTO group, the difference was statistical significance (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.00-5.48, P = 0.05); compared UKA with HTO, a lower incidence of postoperative complications was found, the difference was statistical significance ( RR = 0.46,95% CI 0.24 -1.90, P = 0.02); although the UKA group had a lower rate of revision ,th difference was not statistical significance (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.36-1.52, P = 0.4). Conclusion: Both of the UKA and THO are useful and have their own techniques

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档