网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

当事人程序违法责问失权制度研究-诉讼法学专业论文.docx

当事人程序违法责问失权制度研究-诉讼法学专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共37页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
当事人程序违法责问失权制度研究-诉讼法学专业论文

II II Abstract The system of the accusatory irritancy to illegal procedure is an important component of institution irritancy for parties of civil suits. Because of the objective reality of illegal procedure, it is an inevitable requirement to give parties accusatorial right to illegal procedure for procedural justice. With a view to the conflict between infinite require for the justice and finiteness of judiciary resources, it is indispensable to impose restrictions for accusatorial right. So the accusatory irritancy to illegal procedure obtain the validity. Most countries have instituted rules to the system of irritancy in civil procedure law, but the concept of the accusatory irritancy to illegal procedure is not accepted extensively in our country, except for dispersion of some irritancy in paragraph, such as irritancy to challenge or jurisdictional dissent. The uniform provision about accusatory irritancy doesnt really come out. It certainly lead to apply optionally and lose authority. Parties who have think of a way to do a malicious action will take opportunity to upset litigant order. The target of maintaining social fair and just for law will not be hamstrung. How to use the system of the accusatory irritancy to illegal procedure correctly under both reason and law is needed breaking the back of a tough job. It is also the most important issue in the thesis. On basis of the plenty of research on judicatory situation in our country and compare the system of irritancy in civil suits in other countries ,the thesis divides into three parts for analyzing the system of the accusatory irritancy to illegal procedure. The first part analyzes theoretical value of the system from intension, constitutive requirements and consequences of divesting accusatorial right, to prove escape clause rationality. The second part instances the irritancy to challenge, jurisdictional dissent or appeal and rehear, analyses relevant law in depth. Especially lay particular emphasis on t

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档