- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
On What There Is
Willard Van Orman Quine
Review of Metaphysics (1948). Reprinted in 1953 From a Logical Point of View . Harvard
University Press. Revised and reprinted later
A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three Anglo-
Saxon monosyllables: „What is there?‟ It can be answered, moreover, in a word—
„Everything‟—and everyone will accept this answer as true. However, this is merely to say
that there is what there is. There remains room for disagreement over cases; and so the issue
has stayed alive down the centuries.
Suppose now that two philosophers, McX and I, differ over ontology. Suppose McX
maintains there is something which I maintain there is not. McX can, quite consistently with
his own point of view, describe our difference of opinion by saying that I refuse to recognize
certain entities. I should protest, of course, that he is wrong in his formulation of our
disagreement, for I maintain that there are no entities, of the kind which he alleges, for me to
recognize; but my finding him wrong in his formulation of our disagreement is unimportant,
for I am committed to considering him wrong in his ontology anyway.
When I try to formulate our difference of opinion, on the other hand, I seem to be in a
predicament. I cannot admit that there are some things which McX countenances and I do not,
for in admitting that there are such things I should be contradicting my own rejection of them.
It would appear, if this reasoning were sound, that in any ontological dispute the proponent of
the negative side suffers the disadvantage of not being able to admit that his opponent
disagrees with him.
This is the old Platonic riddle of nonbeing. Nonbeing must in some sense be, otherwise what
is it that there is not? This tangled doctrine might be nicknamed Plato’s beard ; historically it
has proved tough, frequently dulling the edge of Occam‟s razor.
It is some such line of thought that leads philosophers l
您可能关注的文档
- Hilbert电子版.pdf
- Impairment of dendritic cell function by电子版.pdf
- Ingredients of Famine Analysis Availability and Entitlements电子版.pdf
- ISPE对EUGMP附录11计算机系统注释的解读_丁恩峰电子版.pdf
- jameserringtonmotivationinchineseesl电子版.pdf
- JavaCachingwithGuava电子版.pdf
- Libraries and Library - Networks at a Crossroads电子版.pdf
- MacTips电子版.pdf
- motivation in india电子版.pdf
- N1824 (Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard)电子版.pdf
文档评论(0)