浅析防卫过当法学学士.doc

ABSTRACT The new criminal law of China in Article 20 should be held criminally responsible excessive defence acts, but the new criminal law does not make defined to significantly more than the necessary minimum and sign ficant harm， resulting in the judicially practice belong to mea sure whether one had to defend when the deviation. In addition excessive defence Penal Code of the object and subjective aspects of existence must have the deactis of other countries regarding the provisions of excessive defence analysis and learn from our country the Criminal Code should be maximum to replace the necessary level of expression at characterization of sinificant harm must be combined with the suppression of unlawful acts against the effectiveness and the degree of analysis to make judgments，should be weakened at the object of criminal protection againstthe people, to permit on subjective well in case of emergency did not expect the defense the consequences of orientation, in the main should be provided for mental patients intermittently sane at the time of the criminal liaility excessive defence, full 14 years of dissatifaction with 16 years of age is not criminally responsible excessive defence. Research excesive defence be able to practice the administration of justice provide a theoretical basis, and improve citizens who make the struggle against illegal enthusiasm, there is conducive to maintaining social order. Key Words： unlawful attack； legal interest； necessary minimum； great damage； excessive defence 浅析防卫过当 在现实生活中，有些行为在形式上好像符合某罪的犯罪构成要件，实质只具冇较轻的社会 危害性，其与-?般的犯罪有着较大的差别，防卫过当即是如此。对防卫过当进行研究，冇利于 增强公民进行正当防卫的积极性，鼓励人们进行正当防卫，让不法侵害行为对受害人的侵害能 够得到最大限度的阻止，对不法侵害进行有力地反击，也从根本上保护了除不法侵害人之外的 公民和国家的合法权益。但我国对防卫过当的规定存在一定的缺陷，虽然对防卫行为规定了必 要限度，但对“必要限度”的文字表述过于模糊，同时也没冇规定重大损害所指的损害程度， 在客体、主体和主观方面的规定都存在一些缺陷，只有解决这些问题，才能更明确地对防卫过 当进行界定，从而进一步完善我国刑法关于防卫过当的规定。 一、防卫过当的危害 -）损害不法侵害人的合法权益 防卫过当的客体是不法侵害人的人身财产权利和其他利益，即不法侵害人依法受刑法保护 的合法利益。在这里不法侵害人具有双重身份，即是防卫对象，又是犯罪对象，我国法律支持 对不法侵害人的某些权益造成必要的损害的正当防卫行为。但是，同吋不法侵害人还